How materials can be broken-a conceptual understanding

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the conceptual understanding of how materials can be broken, focusing on intermolecular forces, stress-strain relationships, and the complexities involved in material behavior under force. Participants explore theoretical and practical aspects of material science, including the calculation of intermolecular forces and the derivation of stress and strain from these concepts.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that materials have different shapes due to intermolecular forces holding molecules together, while another counters that external factors often dictate shape.
  • There is a proposal that to break a material, one must exceed the intermolecular force, which is generally accepted but nuanced by the complexity of material structures.
  • Questions arise regarding the value of intermolecular forces and how to calculate them, with a participant noting that such calculations are typically only valid for pure, strain-free single crystals.
  • Another participant emphasizes the complexity of molecular interactions, stating that deriving a stress-strain curve is not straightforward and requires experimental data rather than theoretical calculations.
  • Concerns are raised about the misleading nature of the term "intermolecular force" in the context of metals, where free electrons play a significant role in atomic bonding.
  • Discussion includes the idea that there is no net force experienced by atoms in a solid under equilibrium, adding another layer of complexity to the understanding of material behavior.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the complexity of material behavior and the challenges in calculating intermolecular forces, but multiple competing views remain regarding the role of intermolecular forces and the derivation of stress-strain relationships.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the dependence on material purity and structure, the complexity of molecular interactions, and the unresolved nature of how to model these interactions accurately in practical scenarios.

chandran
Messages
137
Reaction score
1
concept problem

There is a material and it is pulled by a distance by applying a force F. Tell me whether my intuitions is correct

1.In the world around we see materials of different shapes because the inter molecular forces bonds the molecules together in such shapes.

2.If one likes to break the material he should first exceed the inter molecular force(or cut the inter molecular force)

3.My question is what is the value of that inter molecular force. If i know that it is equal to "f" i will apply a force greater than "f" and then break the material.

4.How to calculate the inter molecular force.

5.Will my understanding of the above lead to the derivation of the stress & strain.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Look for stress-strain diagram of a material. The tests specifications are given by the ASTM (American Society for Testing Materials), you might want to check that, too.
 
chandran said:
3.My question is what is the value of that inter molecular force. If i know that it is equal to "f" i will apply a force greater than "f" and then break the material.

4.How to calculate the inter molecular force.

5.Will my understanding of the above lead to the derivation of the stress & strain.

I don't think you can just "derive" a stress-strain curve for a material. The interactions between molecules in the material are VERY complex, They don't just simply break, and that's it; the material sample will elongate with plastic deformation, crystalline grain structures can break and then re-attach to the next offset molecule (which is what causes the permanenet plastic deformation). The molecular interactions are so incredibly complex not even the biggest supercomputer can think about trying to solve it, we're talking about degrees of freedom on the order of 100 times avogadro's number!

You would also have to take into account things like interstitial molecules in the grain structure for alloys, imperfections, grain structures and orientations, grain size, pre-stressing, the list goes on forever!

While it seems like a good idea, the fact is you would need an accurate model that knew exactly how the molecules in the material were behaving, and then you would need to model EVERY MOLECULE in the sample. Prorfessors have spent their entire careers studying and trying to understand the nuances of material science, and they will be the first to tell you they have no way to model a tensile or hardness test. It is not entirely understood how the molecules interact in complex situations like the tensile test. This is why the stress-strain curve is derived experimentally, not calculated from basic material properties.

Then of course there is work hardening, and fatigue, which are even deeper subjects than this, and definitely can't be described without real-world data... They can barely be described with empirical testing!

Hope this helps some, or at least let's you know what you're in for :smile:
 
Most everything I'd have said has been covered by Mech Eng above, but to address the specific questions...
chandran said:
1.In the world around we see materials of different shapes because the inter molecular forces bonds the molecules together in such shapes.
Very rarely is this true (eg: shape of a raindrop or soap bubble or snowflake). Most things are the shape they are because of external factors (eg: the glass on your window was rolled into that shape by a machine).

2.If one likes to break the material he should first exceed the inter molecular force(or cut the inter molecular force)
In general this is true.

3.My question is what is the value of that inter molecular force. If i know that it is equal to "f" i will apply a force greater than "f" and then break the material.
Only with a perfectly pure, strain-free single-crystal.

However, the term "intermolecular force" is itself a little misleading. In a metal, for instance, the glue that hold the atoms together is provided by the (delocalized) free electrons - there are no molecules involved. In a polycrystalline material there is no single value for the "intermolecular force".

4.How to calculate the inter molecular force.
Again, only for a pure single-crystal does such a calculation exist. It usually involves some form of the Tight Binding model, but even here, the more accurate calculations use hand-fed parameters. For a purely crystalline ionic solid the Madelung formulation provides solutions for simple cases.

5.Will my understanding of the above lead to the derivation of the stress & strain.
Maybe a little. That's only just the tip of the iceberg.

And now for the bombshell (after all this talk about interatomic forces): There is no net force experienced by the atoms/molecules/ions in a solid under equilibrium.

Even Newton could have told you that. :wink:
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 61 ·
3
Replies
61
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K