How Much Does Increasing Engine Power Affect Top Speed Due to Air Drag?

AI Thread Summary
Increasing engine power by 10 percent results in a new top speed affected by air drag, which is proportional to the square of the speed. The relationship between power and speed can be expressed as P = kv^3, leading to the conclusion that the new speed v_1 can be calculated as the cube root of 1.1 times the original speed v_0. This calculation yields a speed increase of approximately 3.2 percent, contrasting with an initial incorrect estimate of 4.8 percent. The discussion highlights the importance of understanding the mathematical relationships between power, speed, and drag. Ultimately, accurate calculations reveal a more modest increase in top speed due to the modifications in engine power.
Linus Pauling
Messages
187
Reaction score
0
1. A certain car has an engine that provides a maximum power P_0. Suppose that the maximum speed of the car, v_0, is limited by a drag force proportional to the square of the speed (as in the previous part). The car engine is now modified, so that the new power P_1 is 10 percent greater than the original power (P_1=110\%P_0)

Assume the following:

* The top speed is limited by air drag.
* The magnitude of the force of air drag at these speeds is proportional to the square of the speed.

By what percentage, (v_1-v_0)/v_0, is the top speed of the car increased?




2. F_drag = C_d*Av^2
P = -C_d*Av^3




3. P_1 is proportional to v_1^2
Thus, 1.1P_o is proportional to (1 + alpha)^n * v_o^2

Divide by P_o proportional to v_o^n to obtain:

alpha = 1.1^(1/n) - 1

My answer was 4.8% and was wrong. Again, I want the percentage increase (two sig figs) in speed: (v_1 - v_o)/v_o
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Linus, I find the notation confusing. Could we just say F = kv^2 so
P = F*v = k*v^3.
You could then write another equation with 1.1P and some other letter for the faster velocity. It should be easy to eliminate the P between the two equations and come up with an equation relating the two v's. I get considerably less than 4.8% that way.
 
I'm sorry but I don't understand how you're eliminating P, and furthermore how you are getting to a raw percentage.

If I take P = kv_o^3
and
1.1P = kv_1^3

substitute for P in the 1.1P equation:

1.1(kv_o^3) = kv_1^3
1.1v_o^3 = v_1^3

the new speed v_1 would be cuberoot(1.1v_o^3)

?
 
P = kv^3 and 1.1P = kV^3
Put the first in the second:
1.1*kv^3 = kV^3
1.1*v^3 = V^3
V = cube root of 1.1 * v
V = 1.032*v
That is a 3.2% increase in speed.
 
Ah, I didn't realize I could take the cube root of 1.1 and v separately. thank you.
 
Ah, yes. And I didn't make it very clear, not having a cube root symbol handy. Most welcome!
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top