Math Problem Solving: How Much Is Enough?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mathsciguy
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion highlights the balance between enjoying the abstract concepts of mathematics and the challenges of practical problem-solving. The individual expresses a struggle with calculations, noting that while they can grasp theoretical ideas and proofs, practicing problem sets is mentally taxing and time-consuming. They emphasize the importance of improving calculation skills to achieve better grades in college, particularly under exam conditions. The consensus suggests that to perform well, one should aim to solve 10-12 difficult problems within a three-hour exam, ideally completing them in two hours to allow time for review. The individual acknowledges that the definition of "difficult" varies based on their current knowledge and recognizes the need for consistent practice to enhance their problem-solving abilities.
mathsciguy
Messages
134
Reaction score
1
When I study mathematics, I just do it leisurely and at my own pace. Over the course of my whole mathematics education, I've enjoyed learning the abstract ideas/concept in it, the problem is I'm a bit clumsy doing calculations. I can study and do proofs/concepts but practicing problem sets eats my focus big time and I get tired doing it. Now, I can enjoy reading and learning as much math as I want but I really need to brush up with my calculation/problem solving skills, as I'd rather have good grades in college (I tend to solve really slow) at the same time. The question is just how much practice is enough?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Depends on the level you are trying to get to IMO.

The average exams I've had thus far indicate that you should be able to solve at least 10-12 more DIFFICULT problems (many steps) in the 3 hours provided. However, I would say you should be able to solve the 10-12 in 2 hours and have an hour for review--IMO, of course.
 
10-12 difficult problems in 2 hours might still be a little hard to pull of, considering that 'difficult' is something within the reach of my mathematical knowledge. That is to say I just have to know when to throw in those knowledge for the given problems. I guess I just have to do as much as I can.
 
After a year of thought, I decided to adjust my ratio for applying the US/EU(+UK) schools. I mostly focused on the US schools before, but things are getting complex and I found out that Europe is also a good place to study. I found some institutes that have professors with similar interests. But gaining the information is much harder than US schools (like you have to contact professors in advance etc). For your information, I have B.S. in engineering (low GPA: 3.2/4.0) in Asia - one SCI...
I graduated with a BSc in Physics in 2020. Since there were limited opportunities in my country (mostly teaching), I decided to improve my programming skills and began working in IT, first as a software engineer and later as a quality assurance engineer, where I’ve now spent about 3 years. While this career path has provided financial stability, I’ve realized that my excitement and passion aren’t really there, unlike what I felt when studying or doing research in physics. Working in IT...
Hello, I’m an undergraduate student pursuing degrees in both computer science and physics. I was wondering if anyone here has graduated with these degrees and applied to a physics graduate program. I’m curious about how graduate programs evaluated your applications. In addition, if I’m interested in doing research in quantum fields related to materials or computational physics, what kinds of undergraduate research experiences would be most valuable?

Similar threads

Replies
32
Views
446
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
102
Views
5K
Replies
71
Views
826
Replies
16
Views
3K
Back
Top