How much negative energy is that space between two non-conducting plates?

Negeng
Messages
38
Reaction score
0
The negative pressure generated in the Cashmeir effect suggest that negative energy can exist in small spaces between non-conducting plates. How much negative energy exist in a given amount of space as measured in units that refer to energy (as opposed to units of force created by the Cashmeir effect)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Negeng said:
The negative pressure generated in the Cashmeir effect suggest that negative energy can exist in small spaces between non-conducting plates. How much negative energy exist in a given amount of space as measured in units that refer to energy (as opposed to units of force created by the Cashmeir effect)?

As I understand it, there is no consensus on the proper interpretation of the Casimir effect. I do not know that it has been unambiguously shown to be due to the supposed restriction on the wavelengths of virtual particles that can pop into existence between the plates. There is an alternative interpretation which I believe incorporates relativistic effects for the van der Waals force which become significant at the very short distances required to measure the Casimir effect. There are other threads on PF which deal with this topic.

https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=372417
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=396300
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top