How Much Thermal Energy is Required for a Four Month Space Mission?

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the thermal energy requirements for a four-month space mission, focusing on the heat generated by crew members. It estimates that 20 crew members would produce approximately 55.68 kilowatts of heat daily, necessitating around 60 tons of lithium-ion batteries for energy storage. The conversation highlights the challenges of converting thermal energy to electrical energy, referencing the second principle of thermodynamics and the Carnot efficiency limit. A proposal suggests using a temperature differential to improve energy conversion efficiency, with an internal temperature of 300 Kelvin and an ambient space temperature of around three Kelvin. Overall, the feasibility of managing thermal energy in a spacecraft is debated, considering technological advancements.
CIm
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hello! I was wondering if someone could take a look at this idea and tell me if there is something wrong with it:

In attempting to shut down every part of a hypothetical spacecraft except some sort of highly insulated crew pod, the total amount of heat produced over a period of time is equal to the total calories consumed minus any useful mechanical work performed. If a person consumes an average of 2400 kilocalories per day, the average heat produced is 100 kilocalories per hour or 116 watts.

Ignoring all other assumptions, if you were to convert that heat buildup to electrical storage, you get 20 crew x 1 day, 55.68 kilowatts. A kilogram of Li-ion stores 128 Wh[1], so you need 435 kilograms to store the heat energy of the crew for the day. Multiply that by 120 days and you get a little over sixty tons of Li-ion batteries required for a four month journey, easy to fit in on a ten thousand ton ship. With lithium thionyl chloride, used in extremely hazardous or critical applications such as space flight and deep sea diving, you get a little over 10 tons needed.

Now you probably won't get all of the thermal energy, but using new technological advances [2] and say dunking the lot in water to slowly absorb the rest for four months, could you conceivably keep a vessel of this sort at or as near to ambient as makes no odds?

[1]http://www.allaboutbatteries.com/Battery-Energy.html"
[2]http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/09/100930154610.htm"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Science news on Phys.org
Uhm seems like you are ignoring the second principle of thermodynamics. To convert thermal energy to work you need to reservoirs at different temperatures. A lower ratio between the lesser temperature and the upper temperaturemakes the efficiency of you thermal engine higher. Assuming you have an internal temperature equal to 300 Kelvin, what do you plan the lower temperature resorvoir to be?
 
Petr Mugver said:
Assuming you have an internal temperature equal to 300 Kelvin, what do you plan the lower temperature resorvoir to be?
Since the idea is to keep the ship, except the small crew pod, which is inside the ship, at ambient space temperature, it would be around three kelvin. The apparatus to convert the thermal energy to electrical energy and the storage medium would be at the ambient ship temperature, and inside the ship as well.
 
So it should be technically doable?
 
Petr Mugver said:
A lower ratio between the lesser temperature and the upper temperaturemakes the efficiency of you thermal engine higher.
Maybe I'm reading this wrong, but the Carnot limit on thermal efficiency is

2c38c2bf9b428765f846f836e7a81786.png


So the maximum possible efficiency would by 99% in this case, so you'd only need to absorb around 60 kilowatts of heat for the entire journey? Note that you could vent it afterwards, its just being stored long enough to get there.
 
Thread 'Can somebody explain this: Planck's Law in action'
Plotted is the Irradiance over Wavelength. Please check for logarithmic scaling. As you can see, there are 4 curves. Blue AM 0 as measured yellow Planck for 5777 K green Planck for, 5777 K after free space expansion red Planck for 1.000.000 K To me the idea of a gamma-Ray-source on earth, below the magnetic field, which protects life on earth from solar radiation, in an intensity, which is way way way outer hand, makes no sense to me. If they really get these high temperatures realized in...

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
8K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
14K
Replies
35
Views
8K
  • · Replies 61 ·
3
Replies
61
Views
11K
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 152 ·
6
Replies
152
Views
10K