How much time is needed for plate tectonics to subdue everything?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Marco Masi
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Plate Time
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the longevity of fossil records in relation to the efficiency of plate tectonics and the subduction of Earth's crust. Participants explore the implications of geological processes over billions of years, questioning how fossil evidence can persist despite the expected turnover of crustal material.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express confusion about the existence of 3.8 billion-year-old fossil records, questioning the efficiency of plate tectonics in subducting all crustal material within a 500 million-year timeframe.
  • One participant challenges the assumption of 100% efficiency in tectonic activity, suggesting that not all crust is subducted.
  • Another participant notes that approximately 95% of subduction involves oceanic crust rather than continental crust, highlighting that continental crust is rarely subducted.
  • A reference is made to a piece of oceanic crust that is about 340 million years old, suggesting that some crust can persist for significant periods.
  • It is proposed that the turnover time for crustal material is statistical, with some material being subducted earlier than others, and some potentially not being subducted at all.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not appear to reach a consensus, as there are multiple competing views regarding the efficiency of plate tectonics and the implications for fossil record longevity.

Contextual Notes

The discussion reveals limitations in understanding the processes of subduction and the preservation of geological records, with assumptions about efficiency and timeframes remaining unresolved.

Marco Masi
Messages
14
Reaction score
1
I read of fossile records as old as 3.8 billion years. How can this be? Since I thought that it takes about 500 mio. years for plate tectonics to force all the Earth crust into the subduction zones into the mantle. No evidence should be left. I'm confused...
 
Earth sciences news on Phys.org
You really think tectonic activity is 100% efficient?
 
Marco Masi said:
I read of fossile records as old as 3.8 billion years. How can this be? Since I thought that it takes about 500 mio. years for plate tectonics to force all the Earth crust into the subduction zones into the mantle. No evidence should be left. I'm confused...

you are coming from a mistaken understanding.
~ 95% of subduction is oceanic crust NOT continental crust

There are very few places around the world where continental crust is being subducted or anything similar to that. One of those places is the Indian sub-continent as it pushes into the Euro-Asian continent.
There is a mixture of subduction and just straight out collision.Dave
 
Even if the mean turnover time were of the order of 500 Ma, this is to a large extent a statistical process. I.e. there is lot of material which is subduced earlier and some material which is not subduced at all.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
9K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
19K
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K