Plate Tectonics & Evidence of Life

In summary, the conversation discusses the destruction of biological evidence due to the subduction and destruction inherent in plate tectonic activity. The first question asks if there are any places on Earth that have not been affected by tectonic activity, to which the response mentions Australia and the Acasta Gneiss from Canada as potential areas. The second question inquires about the chronological limitation in looking back at fossilized remains due to this activity, to which the response states that plate tectonics does not destroy the oldest evidence, which is preserved in the continental shields. The conversation also touches on the potential for studying biosphere-lithosphere interactions in zircons.
  • #1
Aaron8547
16
2
Looking for research on the destruction of biological evidence due to the subduction and destruction inherent to plate tectonic activity. One, are there any places on Earth that have not been affected by tectonic activity? And two, what is our chronological limitation in looking back at fossilized remains due to them being destroyed by this activity?

Thanks
 
Earth sciences news on Phys.org
  • #2
Aaron8547 said:
Looking for research on the destruction of biological evidence due to the subduction and destruction inherent to plate tectonic activity. One, are there any places on Earth that have not been affected by tectonic activity? And two, what is our chronological limitation in looking back at fossilized remains due to them being destroyed by this activity?

Thanks
There are several places, one is Australia.
Jack Hills, Australia, where rocks were found to contain the oldest known minerals on Earth, a 4.4 billion-year-old zircon. Just three of the very oldest zircons have been found, ones that date back to almost 4.4 billion years ago.

http://www.livescience.com/43584-earth-oldest-rock-jack-hills-zircon.html

The Acasta Gneiss from northern Canada is around 4 billion years old. http://paleobiology.si.edu/geotime/main/hadean4.html
 
  • #3
Some of the earliest 'evidence' of life is kind of iffy. It's hard to distinguish it from non biological origins. I was sitting in a TV room with some senior doctors emeritus when the so-called evidence of life on Mars was presented 20 years ago. They all greeted it with various expressions from 'What a bunch of idiots' to 'huh, you got to be kidding'.

Also, it's just not all that studied. This may be because the conclusions are not all that conclusive and the field of study doesn't have a lot of opportunities. This is not my area of study but I have had rock samples that I was curious about, made thin sections and never get much definitive in answers from the few who can even begin to look at them.

Anyways. Plate tectonics hasn't destroyed everything but what's left is not all that great for giving answers.
 
  • #4
Aaron8547 said:
One, are there any places on Earth that have not been affected by tectonic activity? And two, what is our chronological limitation in looking back at fossilized remains due to them being destroyed by this activity?

The first question is open, since there isn't any consensus on how long plate tectonics has worked. The last affected places or grains are as stated in the thread. However, it seems that from surviving lone zircon grains you can derive a) age of plate tectonics and b) habitability (ocean and crust 4.4 billion years ago) but possibly also habitation (an early biosphere).

a) Possibly plate tectonics started 4.4 billion years ago.

By measuring magnetites inclusions in Jack Hill zircons (see previous comments; but note that the oldest zircon record is extensive, at least some 5000 zircon grains from before the oldest known rocks), a secure observation of an early geodynamo has just been made. It constrains heat flow so that early plate tectonics is implied.

"The values measured by Tarduno and his team were much greater than 0.6 ?T, indicating the presence of a geodynamo at the core of the planet, as well as suggesting the existence of the plate tectonics needed to release the built-up heat.

"There has been no consensus among scientists on when plate tectonics began," said Tarduno. "Our measurements, however, support some previous geochemical measurements on ancient zircons that suggest an age of 4.4 billion years.""

[ http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2015/07/150730162010.htm ]

I think that last bit is tying together the 4.4 billion year old crust observation (from melt characteristics of the rocks that the zircons grew out of, I think) with the process that could have produced it. An early plate tectonics would help explain why there is no surviving rock (as of yet) from early Earth, the early crust was extensively reworked over time.

b) The potential for studying biosphere-litosphere interactions in zircons has just started to come under study:

"This observation, while reflecting 9 granitoids and 289 analyses of zircons from a region where over 400 different plutons have been identified, is consistent with the incorporation of (reduced) organic matter in the former and highlights one possible manner in which life may modify the composition of igneous minerals. The chemical properties of rocks or igneous minerals may extend the search for ancient biological activity to the earliest period of known igneous activity, which dates back to ∼4.4 billion years ago. If organic matter was incorporated into Hadean sediments that were buried and melted, then these biological remnants could imprint a chemical signature within the subsequent melt and the resulting crystal assemblage, including zircon."

[ http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26153630 ]
 
Last edited:
  • #5
Aaron8547 said:
Looking for research on the destruction of biological evidence due to the subduction and destruction inherent to plate tectonic activity.
The ocean floors are made of basalts and are growing at the mid-ocean ridges. The ocean floors are more dense and younger than the continents. The continents are older low density accretions that are not being subducted. Any very old evidence of life must therefore be on, or in, the continents.

It is mountain building on the continents that lifts old evidence to where it can be observed. Evidence of life will be gradually destroyed by erosion after tectonic uplift.
Gentle metamorphism acts to preserve fossil evidence by hardening and sealing a rock. Heavier metamorphism will begin to mobilise the grain boundaries and so begin to destroy evidence of life.

Aaron8547 said:
And two, what is our chronological limitation in looking back at fossilized remains due to them being destroyed by this activity?
Plate tectonics does not really destroy the oldest evidence. The oldest evidence is preserved in the continental shields.
 
  • Like
Likes davenn
  • #6
Baluncore said:
The ocean floors are made of basalts and are growing at the mid-ocean ridges. The ocean floors are more dense and younger than the continents.

yes, indeed. there is no ocean floor older than around 180 million years. A drop in the bucket on the geological time scale of the Earth
 

1. What is plate tectonics?

Plate tectonics is the scientific theory that describes the movement and interactions of large land masses, or plates, on the Earth's surface. These plates are constantly moving and can create various landforms such as mountains, volcanoes, and ocean basins.

2. How do scientists study plate tectonics?

Scientists study plate tectonics through various methods such as satellite imagery, seismology, and geological mapping. They also use tools like GPS to track the movement of plates and collect data on earthquakes and volcanic activity.

3. What evidence supports the theory of plate tectonics?

There are several lines of evidence that support the theory of plate tectonics. These include the matching coastlines of continents, the distribution of fossils and rocks across different continents, and the occurrence of earthquakes and volcanic activity along plate boundaries.

4. How does plate tectonics affect the distribution of life on Earth?

Plate tectonics plays a significant role in shaping the Earth's surface, which in turn affects the distribution of life on our planet. For example, the movement of plates can create new habitats for organisms, while the collision of plates can lead to the formation of mountain ranges that act as barriers for certain species.

5. Are there any connections between plate tectonics and the evolution of life?

Yes, there are connections between plate tectonics and the evolution of life. For instance, the movement of continents has led to changes in climate and the formation of new environments, which have influenced the evolution of species. Additionally, plate tectonics can also affect the distribution of resources and the occurrence of mass extinctions, which can impact the evolution of life on Earth.

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
864
  • Earth Sciences
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • General Discussion
Replies
1
Views
547
Replies
15
Views
9K
  • Earth Sciences
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
33
Views
17K
Replies
7
Views
7K
Back
Top