How much work is done when moving a charge?

  • Thread starter Thread starter iceman2048
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Charge Work
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the work done when moving a particle of charge +2e from infinity to the x-axis in the presence of two stationary charges, +2e and +e. The user applies the superposition principle to compute the potential energy contributions from both charges, resulting in a total potential energy of 1.4466E-28 J. However, the user initially misinterprets the sign of the work done, which should be W = ΔU instead of W = -ΔU. The correction clarifies that the work done is equal to the change in energy.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electrostatic potential energy (U = kQq/r)
  • Familiarity with the superposition principle in electrostatics
  • Knowledge of work-energy principles in physics
  • Basic proficiency in manipulating scientific notation and units of energy (Joules)
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of the superposition principle in electrostatics
  • Learn about the relationship between potential energy and work in electrostatic systems
  • Explore the concept of electric field and its calculation from charge distributions
  • Investigate the effects of varying distances on potential energy calculations
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in physics, particularly those focusing on electrostatics, as well as anyone involved in solving problems related to electric charges and potential energy calculations.

iceman2048
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


In Figure 24-60, we move a particle of charge +2e in from infinity to the x axis. How much work do we do? Distance D is 6.30 m.

http://img216.imageshack.us/img216/6987/fig2460.th.gif


Homework Equations


U = kQq/r
U=-W


The Attempt at a Solution


Ok since there's two stationary charges (2e and e), I figured you could use the superpositioning principle and claculate the work done to move the 2e from infinity to the x-axis against the stationary 2e plus the work done to move it against the stationary e charge. Summing them would give the answer.

U1= (k)(2e)(2e)/(2d) = 7.233E-29 J

U2 = (k)(e)(2e)/d = 7.23E-29 J

U(total) = 7.23E-29 + 7.23E-29 = 1.4466E-28 J

U = -Work
1.4466E-28 = -Work
Work = -1.4466E-28 J

Is my assumption that the superpositioning principle can be used false? Thank you in advance.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Your use of superposition is perfectly correct (although I didn't check your arithmetic). One error is in the sign of the work done: The work done equals the change in energy, in this case W = ΔU (not -ΔU).
 
Thank you very much Doc, you've saved the day once more! I just have one more question left that I'm struggling with but I'm going to try it some more. If I need help, I'll start a new thread to make everything more organized.

Thank you once again Doc!
 

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K