How Often Should I Practice Math?

  • Thread starter Thread starter M83
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
To achieve mastery in mathematics, consistent and immersive practice is essential. The frequency and intensity of practice can vary based on individual goals and levels of study. For those aspiring to research or compete at high levels, daily practice is recommended, often involving a combination of problem-solving and theoretical study. Engaging deeply with the material, to the point of integrating it into daily life, is emphasized as crucial for mastery. Balancing intense study with personal well-being is also important, as excessive focus on math without breaks can lead to burnout. Overall, a dedicated routine that includes both structured practice and casual engagement with mathematical concepts is advocated for effective learning.
M83
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
This probably varies on an individual basis, but generally speaking how often should I practice math in order to achieve a mastery level of it? Is it number of hours? Number of problems? A combination of both? Thanks for any feedback.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
M83 said:
This probably varies on an individual basis, but generally speaking how often should I practice math in order to achieve a mastery level of it? Is it number of hours? Number of problems? A combination of both? Thanks for any feedback.



In order to aspire reasonably to master mathematics you can't limit yourself to "practice" it: you must live it.

DonAntonio
 
DonAntonio said:
In order to aspire reasonably to master mathematics you can't limit yourself to "practice" it: you must live it.

DonAntonio

Could you expand on that?
 
M83 said:
This probably varies on an individual basis, but generally speaking how often should I practice math in order to achieve a mastery level of it? Is it number of hours? Number of problems? A combination of both? Thanks for any feedback.

Often is just too subjective. You should continue to do practice problems until you feel completely at ease. What level of mathematics are you dealing with anyway?
 
if you want to do research and compete with the best on a national or international level, you must do it basically all the time. based on your own expectations, you can extrapolate backwards from there.But it isn't good for you on any other level as a human being. so what to do ?
 
mathwonk said:
But it isn't good for you on any other level as a human being.

Wait. It's not? :cry::cry:
 
USN2ENG said:
What level of mathematics are you dealing with anyway?

I'm still at the basic levels. I'll be starting Precalculus this summer and then Calculus 1 in the fall. I'm going to major in Physics.

mathwonk said:
if you want to do research and compete with the best on a national or international level, you must do it basically all the time. based on your own expectations, you can extrapolate backwards from there.

My goal is to get into research so I don't mind practicing every day, but I want to make sure I'm not practicing too little.
 
M83 said:
I'm still at the basic levels. I'll be starting Precalculus this summer and then Calculus 1 in the fall. I'm going to major in Physics.



My goal is to get into research so I don't mind practicing every day, but I want to make sure I'm not practicing too little.

If you want to make sure you're not practicing too little, then practice every day.
 
i could be wrong, and frequently am. but "all work and no play..." as they used to try to tell me.

i am pretty sure all work and no play, as well as all play and no work, cause problems. (I speak from experience.)
 
  • #10
mathwonk said:
i am pretty sure all work and no play, as well as all play and no work, cause problems. (I speak from experience.)

I find myself fluctuating between these two extremes, unfortunately.
 
  • #11
I recently had to end my career as a software developer because the excessive typing damaged the tendons in my hands. I'm currently living with my folks as a result, and so the majority of my time is spent studying math and physics so that I can catch up with people in my age group (who are ahead of me on account of my having "wasted" so much time on software engineering).

So, my current routine is such that I wake up in the morning and do math exercises from my textbooks, straight out of bed. By around noon I've usually learned something new and complicated enough that's it's worth writing a few pages of notes on, so I go ahead and write for an hour or two. Then I do more exercises, or I do some reading if necessary to get to yet more exercises. By around 7pm or 8pm I start to get a bit sleepy, and so I crawl into bed and do some non-technical reading, usually history books, and usually history of mathematics books in particular. I get to sleep at around 10pm and then get up at 6am to repeat the whole study schedule all over again, ad infinitum, or until my folks kick me out :-p

I also have a girlfriend from a nearby college who I go out with a few times per week, so I'm not a total shut-in (though I have embarrassingly little social life outside of just her). But by and large my life since having moved back home has been all studying, basically all of the time. I don't think there's anything like "too much" if you really enjoy it.

Like DonAntonio said, "live it" :-)
 
  • #12
I am also intending to become a mathematician and there is almost always some mathematical problem or concept which is lingering in the back of my mind. So 'all the time' is actually a more serious answer than at first it might appear. I wouldn't be able to count the number of times that I've come upon the solution to a proof while in the shower or driving somewhere or just sitting idly waiting for someone.

I get the impression that mathematicians spend the majority of their time confused about something or other, so there is always something to think about, mathwonk could probably confirm this.
 
  • #13
Poopsilon said:
I get the impression that mathematicians spend the majority of their time confused about something or other, so there is always something to think about, mathwonk could probably confirm this.

Excellent way of putting it, agreed! :-)
 
Back
Top