Schools How reliable are university rankings?

[StoneTemplePython]

A

And Python --StoneTemple $^{TM}$ ;) or Regular Flavor -- allows you to see results quickly, which can help keep you motivated.

Haha, when OP was asking about studying at universities in Germany, I thought, well: What Would Gauss Do? University of Goettingen seems alright.

 

[Grands]

Ok guys, thanks for the help, but could you post this message in the other thread next time?
Just because I didn't have enough answers about how much great companies cares about the university that people made.

 

[Grands]

Dr.Courtney said that one day I will have to compete to other people's CV on the pile, so this make me to suppose that is better to do in the best possibile university, it is?
My issue is that I don't what to spend more money in doing a university that far away from me and will make me invest so much money without having no advantages.

 

[jtbell]

The thesis adviser is more important than the University.

This advice is relevant for graduate school; the OP is currently looking for a university for his bachelor's degree, if I remember correctly.

If he eventually finishes a Ph.D., few people looking to hire him will care where he did his bachelor's.

 

[Grands]

This advice is relevant for graduate school; the OP is currently looking for a university for his bachelor's degree, if I remember correctly.

That's correct.

 

[Dr. Courtney]

The Nobel winners?
But there are very few Nobel winners that teach...

The Nobel Laureates in Physics with faculty positions still tend to be active in teaching. Carl Wieman, for example, not only continued teaching, but published many paper in The Physics Teacher:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carl_Wieman
https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0,11&q=Carl+Wieman+the+physics+teacher&btnG=

Wolfgang Ketterle also continues to be actively engaged in teaching.

Teaching duties at R1 universities tend to be light, often only 1-2 classes a year. This may explain the rare occurrence of students having classes with Nobel Laureates.

When I was at MIT, I never felt disappointed about the inability to get into classes taught by the profs I regarded as true luminaries. Of course, I had to find out what courses they were teaching and sign up for them: Alan Guth, Jeffry Goldstone, Barton Zwiebach, Michel Baranger, Michael Feld, David Pritchard, Dan Kleppner, etc., etc. I was not in a single course taught by a TA. (TAs had mostly grading duties and some duties as instructors of introductory laboratories.) LIkewise, as an undergrad at LSU, all the physics classes I took were taught by tenured faculty who were prominent in their fields. One freshman physics lab was delivered by a well-qualified graduate student under the close and watchful guidance of the tenured professor who taught the lecture portion of the intro course. I never felt short shrift.

(Admittedly, some of the students we mentor are having less satisfying experiences at highly esteemed universities. If there is a trend, it is a trend toward lower quality in the large lectures with hundreds of students. Students in courses with smaller class sizes tend to report more positive experiences.)

 

[Grands]

@Dr. Courtney Thanks for the message, in Italy we tend to show the respect for the people, we have a polite form that is called "dare del lei" that in english doesn't exist, so I can't use it.
When I was talking about the still living Nobel Price that teach I forgot to say that in Italy we have no Nobel price alive, maybe you know about Fermi or Giulio Natta.

Students in courses with smaller class sizes tend to report more positive experiences.)

I get it, the fanny thing is that in Italy very few people go to the university, only 20% of the population have a degree, and very few people choose Physics or Math.
What I want to say is that classes of Physics or Math are always very small, at least 12 student, as you may think, there is no admittance test, because there is no need, since the students are very few.

Anyway, my question is about investing more money to do a university that has a better position in the international ranking, going to one that is 180th instead of 400th or 850th.

Thanks.

 

[Grands]

I mean , some schools will advertise the fact that they have the Nobelists and people will assume they will teach. Same for famous researchers. Large classes will be taught by TAs ( teaching assistants). Are you intending to come to the U.S? Are you applying for undergraduate or masters/PHD

I'm not intended to come in the US for the undergraduate degree, maybe for the mater degree of for the PhD, if I will do it.

The thesis adviser is more important than the University. Make sure you go to a university where you will be in the upper half. Then you will be recognized and accepted by a good adviser. Go to a university that has a good group in the field you're interested in. That is more important than the overall ranking of the University.

Ok but how do I know if a university has a good group of teacher ?
100% of them are unknown, I means, I just can see them curriculum vitae, but I can't understand from it if they are good teachers.

Make sure you go to a university where you will be in the upper half

Upper half of the total ranking?
I can't know if a university has a good group of people, I means, how can I discover this?

 

[WWGD]

I'm not intended to come in the US for the undergraduate degree, maybe for the mater degree of for the PhD, if I will do it.Ok but how do I know if a university has a good group of teacher ?
100% of them are unknown, I means, I just can see them curriculum vitae, but I can't understand from it if they are good teachers.Upper half of the total ranking?
I can't know if a university has a good group of people, I means, how can I discover this?

Don't you have websites like "Rate your professor" http://www.ratemyprofessors.com/
in Italy? Otherwise, if, as you say, there are a few students, just-about any professor will be happy to help someone
as enthusiastic as yourself. I don't think it really matters that much at your level, given the situation as you describe it.

 

[Grands]

Don't you have websites like "Rate your professor" http://www.ratemyprofessors.com/
in Italy? Otherwise, if, as you say, there are a few students, just-about any professor will be happy to help someone
as enthusiastic as yourself. I don't think it really matters that much at your level, given the situation as you describe it.

This are italian teachers https://www.quicosenza.it/news/wp-c...6483261109251_roma-protesta-dei-docenti-p.jpg

This year they blocked exams in university, so students couldn't took them http://www.lastampa.it/2017/08/28/e...-september-A6uROBiQmgPHjyxnuSB2FL/pagina.html.

So many people didn't graduated in time for this reason.
You can image that they are agains't this kind of rating like ratemyprofessor, because they thing that they cannot be criticized.

 

[gmax137]

Upper half of which ranking? ...

Not to speak for Clem but I'm sure he meant, a school where you will be in the upper half of the students at that school.

 

[Grands]

What means be in the upper half?
Have great marks?

 

[Grands]

Here guys I found the ranking that wikipedia gives to the italian universities https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_universities_in_Italy.
At the end of the page you can see them.

In this case do you suggest me to join a university that is on the top of those rankings ?

Thanks.

 

[symbolipoint]

Choose Computer Science or Engineering, choose a school, earn your degree, and get a job!

 

[WWGD]

Choose Computer Science or Engineering, choose a school, earn your degree, and get a job!

Like Symbolipoint says. At this level of undergraduate , it does not really matter that much. Apply yourself, find an area of interest while you do your studies and then look for someone doing research in that area.

 

[f95toli]

In this case do you suggest me to join a university that is on the top of those rankings ?

Thanks.

No, rankings of this type are completely useless when choosing where to do your undergraduate degree. There are many reasons for this, but the two most obvious is that rankings are (usually) based on research output and say very little about e.g. the quality of the teachers. Secondly, the quality also varies (sometimes a lot) between different subjects; some universities are e.g. good for say languages or medicine but not so great for science (and vice versa).
MIT is considered to be a great university; but it wouldn't be your first choice you say wanted to study medieval Spanish music.

 

[WWGD]

No, rankings of this type are completely useless when choosing where to do your undergraduate degree. There are many reasons for this, but the two most obvious is that rankings are (usually) based on research output and say very little about e.g. the quality of the teachers. Secondly, the quality also varies (sometimes a lot) between different subjects; some universities are e.g. good for say languages or medicine but not so great for science (and vice versa).
MIT is considered to be a great university; but it wouldn't be your first choice you say wanted to study medieval Spanish music.

I agree here; the cost-benefit analysis ( cost being mostly the high tuition) does not bear it out at this level.

 

[Grands]

Secondly, the quality also varies (sometimes a lot) between different subjects; some universities are e.g. good for say languages or medicine but not so great for science (and vice versa).
MIT is considered to be a great university; but it wouldn't be your first choice you say wanted to study medieval Spanish music.

In general the general ranking respect the ranking of the subject.

If you pick a subject like physics or engineering you will see that a university that is 180% can have this subjects at least in the 180th position, in my case the Polytechnic has the courses of engineering on the top 50 of the world, if we watch only that the specific subjects ( mechanical, electrical, electronic, biomedical etc..).

If you choose a university that is 450th you can see that the rating by subject it's similar, can be in a range between 350th and 450th.

I agree here; the cost-benefit analysis ( cost being mostly the high tuition) does not bear it out at this level.

In italy the university has the same tuition fees, from North to South italy, because are all public.

 

[symbolipoint]

In general the general ranking respect the ranking of the subject.

If you pick a subject like physics or engineering you will see that a university that is 180% can have this subjects at least in the 180th position, in my case the Polytechnic has the courses of engineering on the top 50 of the world, if we watch only that the specific subjects ( mechanical, electrical, electronic, biomedical etc..).

If you choose a university that is 450th you can see that the rating by subject it's similar, can be in a range between 350th and 450th.

No clear main idea; completely obscure meaning.

In italy the university has the same tuition fees, from North to South italy, because are all public.

Good. Not very many worries about funding.
Choose Computer Science or Engineering, choose a school, earn your degree, and get a job!

 

[Grands]

No clear main idea; completely obscure meaning.

@f95toli said that it doesn't mind the general ranking, all that matter is the ranking by the subject.

Well, if you look at the subject of each university you will see that this subject ( that can be Physics, Chemistry, Mechanical engineering, electrical engineering) in the "ranking by subject" has a position that reflect the position of the university in the general ranking.

For example one of the three Polytechnic of Italy is in the top 180 universities.
If you watch at the ranking of one subject of this university, you will see that this is in a good position, and must be in the top 180th position, in particular mechanical engineering is on the 28th position.

If you pick a university that is 400th in the general ranking, you can see that the subject of that university are between the 350th and the 450th position in the "ranking by subjects"

 

[symbolipoint]

@f95toli said that it doesn't mind the general ranking, all that matter is the ranking by the subject.

Well, if you look at the subject of each university you will see that this subject ( that can be Physics, Chemistry, Mechanical engineering, electrical engineering) in the "ranking by subject" has a position that reflect the position of the university in the general ranking.

For example one of the three Polytechnic of Italy is in the top 180 universities.
If you watch at the ranking of one subject of this university, you will see that this is in a good position, and must be in the top 180th position, in particular mechanical engineering is on the 28th position.

If you pick a university that is 400th in the general ranking, you can see that the subject of that university are between the 350th and the 450th position in the "ranking by subjects"

Seems a bit clearer now.
Rankings mean very little. One university or program is nearly always better or worse than others. Nearly none are absolute best. Same with things about people. No matter how good/smart/strong one is, someone else is always better/smarter/stronger.

 

[CrysPhys]

To: OP. This is a long and winding thread, and I admit I haven't read it carefully. But there are at least two different issues concerning a university ranking. The first arises before you have enrolled, when you are evaluating a school in determining whether it will provide you the education that you want. The second arises after you have graduated, when others are evaluating you: e.g., an admissions committee evaluating you as a potential candidate for grad school, an employer evaluating you as a potential hire, a venture capital firm evaluating you as a potential investment, another person evaluating you as a potential spouse ... The first, you do the research and decide. The second depends on the individual who is evaluating you. If you're concerned about a university with a strong reputation whose prestige immediately enhances others' perception of you, under the most general circumstances, then there are only a few universities in the world that will fit the bill: probably MIT and Harvard (perhaps a couple of others) in the US, Oxford and Cambridge in the UK, and maybe the Sorbonne in France; these are the "brand-name" schools. In other instances, some universities are well-known world-wide to professionals in a particular field, but do not have the general prestige of a brand-name school. One example is UIUC (University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign), which has one of the top physics research departments in the world.

In most instances, however, the only rankings that matter are local (or regional). An engineering employer in the US will likely know the US universities that produce top candidates. It won't matter that some published report rates the Institute of X (e.g., in China, Japan, or Singapore) much higher than, e.g, the University of Michigan (just a random example). The employer probably won't be familiar with Institute of X, but will be with the University of Michigan. Exceptions do arise, of course. I was mentoring a student who got her BS in China and her PhD in the US. The US school has a strong dept in her major. But it turned out that one manager at a US company she interviewed with was also originally from China and had gotten her BS from the same university as the applicant. I had the chance to speak to the manager at some point. She told me that the university in China was one of the toughest, and it was rare to get a 4.0/4.0 GPA. My mentee had a 4.0 GPA in China, so the manager knew she was good and decided to hire her right away.

So you need to ask yourself: Do you plan to study in Italy and work in Italy? Do you plan to study in another country and return to work in Italy? Do you plan to study in another country and work in another country (same country in which you study or a different one?)?

 

[Grands]

To: OP. This is a long and winding thread, and I admit I haven't read it carefully. But there are at least two different issues concerning a university ranking. The first arises before you have enrolled, when you are evaluating a school in determining whether it will provide you the education that you want. The second arises after you have graduated, when others are evaluating you: e.g., an admissions committee evaluating you as a potential candidate for grad school, an employer evaluating you as a potential hire, a venture capital firm evaluating you as a potential investment, another person evaluating you as a potential spouse ... The first, you do the research and decide. The second depends on the individual who is evaluating you. If you're concerned about a university with a strong reputation whose prestige immediately enhances others' perception of you, under the most general circumstances, then there are only a few universities in the world that will fit the bill: probably MIT and Harvard (perhaps a couple of others) in the US, Oxford and Cambridge in the UK, and maybe the Sorbonne in France; these are the "brand-name" schools. In other instances, some universities are well-known world-wide to professionals in a particular field, but do not have the general prestige of a brand-name school. One example is UIUC (University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign), which has one of the top physics research departments in the world.

In most instances, however, the only rankings that matter are local (or regional). An engineering employer in the US will likely know the US universities that produce top candidates. It won't matter that some published report rates the Institute of X (e.g., in China, Japan, or Singapore) much higher than, e.g, the University of Michigan (just a random example). The employer probably won't be familiar with Institute of X, but will be with the University of Michigan. Exceptions do arise, of course. I was mentoring a student who got her BS in China and her PhD in the US. The US school has a strong dept in her major. But it turned out that one manager at a US company she interviewed with was also originally from China and had gotten her BS from the same university as the applicant. I had the chance to speak to the manager at some point. She told me that the university in China was one of the toughest, and it was rare to get a 4.0/4.0 GPA. My mentee had a 4.0 GPA in China, so the manager knew she was good and decided to hire her right away.

So you need to ask yourself: Do you plan to study in Italy and work in Italy? Do you plan to study in another country and return to work in Italy? Do you plan to study in another country and work in another country (same country in which you study or a different one?)?

So in general do you want to say that very few universities have a "brad name", but at the same time many companies know very well the preparation the student have from a specific university, this is a good information to know.

Due to the fact that I don't know where I will live in my future, I want to chose a university that allow me to do almost everything, that gives me the opportunity to go and work everywhere I want.
I'm saying this for mainly two reasons.
1) The actual italian situation in terms of having a good carrier is not so high, there are very few serious company,
2) I can probably find that a country outside Italy give me the opportunity to have a life that I like more then having one in Italy.

I would like to study in another country ( in english) but is not easy.
In UK there is the Brexit,.
In theUS is very hard to enter without a VISA, I would have to win a green card.
Germany can be a good opportunity but I find out that courses aren't in english and I don't have the time lo learn german language.

So my goal would be to do a university that allow me to go everywhere I would like to, I don't want to limit myself since now, I have to my life.

 

[CrysPhys]

I would like to study in another country ( in english) but is not easy.
(a) In UK there is the Brexit,.
(b) In theUS is very hard to enter without a VISA, I would have to win a green card.
(c) Germany can be a good opportunity but I find out that courses aren't in english and I don't have the time lo learn german language.

(d) So my goal would be to do a university that allow me to go everywhere I would like to, I don't want to limit myself since now, I have to my life.

<<Reference letters in bold added.>>

(a) You should find out what the effect of Brexit specifically on students will be (assuming it's known). See (b).

(b) You have this all mixed up. A green card is issued for permanent residents; it is distinct from a visa. One option is to win one via the green card lottery, but this is but one very limited option; there are more common ones. All this is moot in your instance: A green card is not needed to study in the US. There are different categories of visas. To study at a university in the US, you need a student visa. If you are accepted for admission to a university in the US, the university admissions department will assist you with filing an application for a student visa. The US so far has been very welcoming of foreign students.

(c) If Germany offers you the opportunities you want, then take an intensive course in German. That is under your control, and limited only by yourself.

(d) Then apply for a brand-name school and see if you get in. In general, making choices leads to limitations of some sort.

 

[symbolipoint]

ChrysPhys makes a point which needs to be emphasized:

(d) Then apply for a brand-name school and see if you get in. In general, making choices leads to limitations of some sort.

.

 

[Grands]

You have this all mixed up. A green card is issued for permanent residents; it is distinct from a visa. One option is to win one via the green card lottery, but this is but one very limited option; there are more common ones. All this is moot in your instance: A green card is not needed to study in the US. There are different categories of visas. To study at a university in the US, you need a student visa. If you are accepted for admission to a university in the US, the university admissions department will assist you with filing an application for a student visa. The US so far has been very welcoming of foreign students.

So first I have to ask a university and then to get the VISA?
To be admitted I need to do interviews ?
Cause in Italy is different, 90% of university don't have any test and accept all the students, this is because very few people go to the university.

If Germany offers you the opportunities you want, then take an intensive course in German. That is under your control, and limited only by yourself.

It's not easy, you know, italian is not my primary language, I speak three languages, and German is very difficult because is not a Latin language, it would be more easy to learn spanish, or french, but I would need at least 4 months to learn German and I don't have time because I go to school, and as you may not italian school is very hard.

Then apply for a brand-name school and see if you get in. In general, making choices leads to limitations of some sort.

I would like to, but there aren't many italian university well-know, I suppose, I would like to go to a USA university because are well-know and are in english, but it's not easy I suppose, also because I don't know how hard is to apply.
You can think at the fact that in Italy we don't know what means " apply" to university, because we don't do, and also my teachers of high school don't know what this means, they also told me " we lived in another situation with no globalization".

 

[CrysPhys]

(a) So first I have to ask a university and then to get the VISA?
To be admitted I need to do interviews ?
Cause in Italy is different, 90% of university don't have any test and accept all the students, this is because very few people go to the university....(b) I would like to, but there aren't many italian university well-know, I suppose, I would like to go to a USA university because are well-know and are in english, but it's not easy I suppose, also because I don't know how hard is to apply.
You can think at the fact that in Italy we don't know what means " apply" to university, because we don't do, and also my teachers of high school don't know what this means, they also told me " we lived in another situation with no globalization".

<<Reference letters in bold added.>>

(a) You need to be accepted by a US university in order to apply for a student visa. This makes sense, right? If you're not accepted by a US university, why would the US issue you a student visa. See: https://travel.state.gov/content/visas/en/study-exchange/student.html .

It's up to each university whether they want to interview you as part of the admissions process. But it would likely be done over the phone or via Skype, not requiring you to fly over, if that's your concern.

(b) I'm lost. If you don't apply to an Italian university, how do you enroll? You just walk into a classroom?

You can't have it both ways. You complain about how messed up the Italian university system is and the lack of career opportunities in Italy, but you seem very reticent to take the initiative to study in another country. Most major university websites have details for foreign applications. Look them up. Also email the admissions office and schedule a call if you need further info. If you're not willing to do this, then settle for the best you can do in Italy. At least the food is very good there.

 

[Grands]

It's up to each university whether they want to interview you as part of the admissions process. But it would likely be done over the phone or via Skype, not requiring you to fly over, if that's your concern.

Wow, universities walks via Skype?
My teachers told me that Skype and Facebook are the worst possibile thing that exist.
I didn't know day, sorry, I grew up in another culture, unfortunately.

I'm lost. If you don't apply to an Italian university, how do you enroll? You just walk into a classroom?

You can go in the classroom without being a stunted.

You don't have to apply to university, you just go and subscribe yourself giving your ID, paying the tax ( very low, less then 200 euros) and then you are a student.

you seem very reticent to take the initiative to study in another country.

I'm not reticent, I just don't know where to start, considering that the countries close to mine doesn't have courses taught in english.

 

[symbolipoint]

Grands tells us this:

You can go in the classroom without being a stunted.

You don't have to apply to university, you just go and subscribe yourself giving your ID, paying the tax ( very low, less then 200 euros) and then you are a student.

Unbelievable! No social order? This cannot really be true.

 

[Grands]

Grands tells us this:

Unbelievable! No social order? This cannot really be true.

What do you mean with social order?

 

[symbolipoint]

...
You can go in the classroom without being a stunted.

You don't have to apply to university, you just go and subscribe yourself giving your ID, paying the tax ( very low, less then 200 euros) and then you are a student.I'm not reticent, I just don't know where to start, considering that the countries close to mine doesn't have courses taught in english.

(not sure if "stunted" is misspelling of "student")

Grands tells us this:

Unbelievable! No social order? This cannot really be true.

What do you mean with social order?

A reminder is that you are still young, and just finishing high school, before starting any university education.
One commonly expects to attend a university based on being eligible and being admitted to the university, after formally applying for admission. Then one commonly expects to enroll into courses each term according to any required pre-requisites in case the course requires them. Nobody simply walks into a university, pays their fees and just goes to classes.

 

[CrysPhys]

You don't have to apply to university, you just go and subscribe yourself giving your ID, paying the tax ( very low, less then 200 euros) and then you are a student.

Let me try to understand the situation in Italy; it sounds so bizarre to me. A student who graduates from high school can attend any Italian university of his choosing. The Italian university does not evaluate how good he is. Is this correct? According to you this works because very few people go to the universities so there is always room; and, furthermore, according to you, since all the Italian universities are about the same, you don't have the issue of all the students enrolling in the same (best) one, and leaving the rest empty? Is this correct?

Does this apply only for undergrad (bachelor's)? What about grad (master's and PhD)?

 

[Grands]

Let me try to understand the situation in Italy; it sounds so bizarre to me. A student who graduates from high school can attend any Italian university of his choosing.

Yes.
Italian university doesn't care where you have studied or how good you was at school, they just watch if you have a diploma from high school, but you don't have to give any documents, just the identity card.
You can go to the university you want, there are some exception in some cases because there isn't enough space in the classroom for everyone.
For example there are university where in a classroom there are about 10-15 students, why you should select them? Less students means less money.
This happens in the math or physics degree, because very few people are interested in this field due to the fact that there aren't many job opportunities and there is no research of quality, especially in the physics field.
In other courses like engineering or medicine there are 150-200 students in the same classroom, because this major usually gives more job opportunities.
I remember that one year the university of math make an offers, by giving free textbooks and 200 euros to spend in education for those people that wanted to go to the university of math.

The Italian university does not evaluate how good he is. Is this correct?

Yes, 90% of university has no admission, and those one that have it it's because they don't have enough space in the classrooms.
Sometimes there are some test that you can do to see if you are prepared to the university but you don't have to pass it or make a certain score.

According to you this works because very few people go to the universities so there is always room

University doesn't give rooms to students, this happens outside Italy? I don't know.
Here you have to go find by yourself a house near the university and you have to find a way to arrive at it by yourself, there aren't campus, there is only a classroom with chairs and a blackboard, you just sit down and watch the lessons.

and, furthermore, according to you, since all the Italian universities are about the same, you don't have the issue of all the students enrolling in the same (best) one

Italian university aren't the same, the italian government says that all university have to offer the same preparation, but this is only in theory.
The true is that the universities aren't all the same, very few have good labs, with good tools for students, this is why in Italy we don't make much research, and researchers are frustrated, but this is another story.

The fact is that the government want to assure the equality between all the universities, this is because 97% of the university are public ones and receives the same money for italian government, but they are not all equal because there is corruption, because there are people that doesn't invest that money in the right way or prefer to put them in their pocket.
So the money of a university derives parts from the government and parts from students ( but you know that taxes are very low compared to those one in the US or UK, or sometimes you don't have to pay).

Does this apply only for undergrad (bachelor's)? What about grad (master's and PhD)?

There is no big difference between undergraduate degree and master degree, as I said before the master degree is seen as the natural prosecution of the university.

 

[symbolipoint]

______________________________________________________________________________↑
According to you this works because very few people go to the universities so there is always room
University doesn't give rooms to students, this happens outside Italy? I don't know.
Here you have to go find by yourself a house near the university and you have to find a way to arrive at it by yourself, there aren't campus, there is only a classroom with chairs and a blackboard, you just sit down and watch the lessons.
_______________________________________________________________________________What CrysPhys meant was, occupancy space in the classrooms, not rooms locally in which to dwell. Regardless, your description was enlightening.

 

[symbolipoint]

Grands says this:

Italian university aren't the same, the italian government says that all university have to offer the same preparation, but this is only in theory.
The true is that the universities aren't all the same, very few have good labs, with good tools for students, this is why in Italy we don't make much research, and researchers are frustrated, but this is another story.

Interesting would it be to know about some statistics on percentage of Italian citizens who attend a college or university OUTSIDE of Italy.

 

[CrysPhys]

University doesn't give rooms to students, this happens outside Italy? I don't know.
Here you have to go find by yourself a house near the university and you have to find a way to arrive at it by yourself, there aren't campus, there is only a classroom with chairs and a blackboard, you just sit down and watch the lessons.

By "room", I did not mean housing, I meant capacity in the university to accommodate the number of students. That is, if students are free to attend any university they choose, then, if a particular university is very popular for some reason, a lot of students would simply choose to go there ... this assumes that the university has enough capacity (classrooms, professors, ...) to accommodate them. In the US, you need to apply to a university, and the university needs to accept you. The university controls the number of students they enroll by limiting the number of students they accept.

 

[Grands]

By "room", I did not mean housing, I meant capacity in the university to accommodate the number of students. That is, if students are free to attend any university they choose, then, if a particular university is very popular for some reason, a lot of students would simply choose to go there ... this assumes that the university has enough capacity (classrooms, professors, ...) to accommodate them. In the US, you need to apply to a university, and the university needs to accept you. The university controls the number of students they enroll by limiting the number of students they accept.

Due to the fact that universities has almost the same number of students every years they don't have problem of space, and there aren't many students that come in Italy from outside Italy.

 

[Eric Bretschneider]

For about the first 5 years of work, employers care about where you received your degree. They have little else to base an evaluation on. A good interviewer won't even bother looking at the school you graduated from other than the fact that you graduated. Your GPA and school tell someone about your POTENTIAL - consider it a measure of your theoretical performance.

Five years into your career you should have proof of your actual performance - this isn't theory anymore, its reality. Would you hire a person with a perfect GPA from a top school with a 5 year history or mediocre accomplishments or a graduate with a much lower GPA from a mid rank school who has a history of making real contributions? The farther you get in your career, the less the school you graduated from and your GPA matters.

This isn't rocket science and the mindset that a top school is required to get you a good job is beyond idiotic. Does it help - yes, is it a guarantee - no.

(for reference, I received my Ph.D. in Chemical Engineering 20 years ago. No one ever asks about my GPA and where I received my degree. They make offers based on my track record of accomplishments.)

 

[Grands]

Five years into your career you should have proof of your actual performance - this isn't theory anymore, its reality. Would you hire a person with a perfect GPA from a top school with a 5 year history or mediocre accomplishments or a graduate with a much lower GPA from a mid rank school who has a history of making real contributions? The farther you get in your career, the less the school you graduated from and your GPA matters.

Do you want to say that person that obtain a degree from the top universities could be less prepared for a job and do a worst 5-years of carrier then who graduate from a not very known university?
It would be a relief that the answer to this question is yes.
My double is also about the fact that non all the university give the same preparation.

 

[Eric Bretschneider]

That could be. My real point is that some people do very well in a classroom environment with a great deal of structure. Honestly being a good student doesn't take a great deal of initiative - all you have to do is complete the assignments your are given which almost always include all the information you need to answer questions. Top performers in the real world create their own structure and take initiative. They can finish an assignment when they were given vague instructions or incomplete data. They can identify the information they need and then find it or find a way to make a reasonable guess.

Here is the US, engineers with undergraduate degrees from MIT are somewhat notorious for believing they are the smartest person in the room and will resort to unbelievably complicated theoretical analyses of problems. I have actually seen some spend hours calculating an answer they could look up in a matter of minutes (the calculations proved how intelligent they were).

So it really boils down to can you work with other people and survive in the real world. Communication is probably the most important skill set to develop. No one cares how smart/capable you are if you can't communicate.

 

[Mark44]

Do you want to say that person that obtain a degree from the top universities could be less prepared for a job and do a worst 5-years of carrier then who graduate from a not very known university?

What you quoted from Eric is more about what happens a few years into your career.

Does it help - yes, is it a guarantee - no.

Right after you graduate, you probably don't have a record of accomplishments other than your degree, so all a prospective employer has to go on is your grade point average (GPA) and supporting references and letters of recommendation.
Five years after graduation, where you graduated and your grades are less important than what you have accomplished -- that's what he is saying.

 

[Eric Bretschneider]

Exactly.

BTW: During that interview your ability to communicate will help to make you stand out. Another point: I hate interviews with candidates have no questions. Yes I will have a lot of questions I want answers to, but an interview is a two-way street. If the candidate doesn't care to do any research on my company and has no questions then they have demonstrated a lack of initiative.

 

[CrysPhys]

Right after you graduate, you probably don't have a record of accomplishments other than your degree, so all a prospective employer has to go on is your grade point average (GPA) and supporting references and letters of recommendation.
Five years after graduation, where you graduated and your grades are less important than what you have accomplished -- that's what he is saying.

With one important exception. Should you need to change career paths substantially (say from physics R&D or EE design to patent law, technical journalism, or venture capital for high-tech start-ups, a pedigree from a brand-name school such as MIT, Harvard, Oxford, or Cambridge will still help open doors, 5, 10, 20 years down the road. That's because you don't have an established track record in the new field, and supporting peripheral factors come back into play (details of GPAs and transcripts won't come into play far into the future, though).