How soon will the universe reach a lower energylevel?

  • Thread starter Thread starter QuantumNet
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Universe
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the concept of the universe's temperature curve resembling an atom's transition to a lower energy level. Participants question the validity of this analogy and seek sources for supporting diagrams. There is a debate about the implications of a cooling universe, including the potential for ether particles to come closer together and the possibility of another Big Bang occurring in the distant future. The conversation also touches on the fate of matter and information in the universe, suggesting that as matter disappears, it could lead to a resurgence of energy that forms new matter. Overall, the thread explores the interplay between quantum physics and cosmic evolution.
QuantumNet
The "temperature in the universe" curve looks like the diagram describing an atom reaching a lower energylevel.
 
Space news on Phys.org
Originally posted by QuantumNet
The "temperature in the universe" curve looks like the diagram describing an atom reaching a lower energylevel.
Source? Which particular curve and diagram(s) do you most like to use?
 


Originally posted by Nereid
Source? Which particular curve and diagram(s) do you most like to use?

All I've seen.

And again Best wishes
 
We should start a new forum: development of observations...

I've never seen a diagram of an atom reaching a lower energy level.
 


Originally posted by QuantumNet
All I've seen.
That won't cut it. If you're not going to support your assertions, why even post the thread?
 


If it's true, it's true with a bang,
But if it's false.

There is no ether (the laws of quantum physics gives us this).

Do you agree?

The colder the universe gets the higher the risk would be for all ether particles to come one step closer to each other.

I think there actually is going to be another Big Bang.

within 35 000 000 000 years, anyway.


Let's say that Hawking is right and matter just disappears.

But the info must remain.

What if the loss makes the ether reach a higher energy level?

When enough matter and energy has disappeared, the ether would eventually go back to the old energy level.

and send out a pulse of energy that forms matter.




The universe is a big warm pulsing heart and we are in the middle of a heartbeat. The heartbeats are neverending, as well the heart.

(quantumphysically anyway)

Don't you agree?
 
Last edited:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recombination_(cosmology) Was a matter density right after the decoupling low enough to consider the vacuum as the actual vacuum, and not the medium through which the light propagates with the speed lower than ##({\epsilon_0\mu_0})^{-1/2}##? I'm asking this in context of the calculation of the observable universe radius, where the time integral of the inverse of the scale factor is multiplied by the constant speed of light ##c##.
The formal paper is here. The Rutgers University news has published a story about an image being closely examined at their New Brunswick campus. Here is an excerpt: Computer modeling of the gravitational lens by Keeton and Eid showed that the four visible foreground galaxies causing the gravitational bending couldn’t explain the details of the five-image pattern. Only with the addition of a large, invisible mass, in this case, a dark matter halo, could the model match the observations...
Hi, I’m pretty new to cosmology and I’m trying to get my head around the Big Bang and the potential infinite extent of the universe as a whole. There’s lots of misleading info out there but this forum and a few others have helped me and I just wanted to check I have the right idea. The Big Bang was the creation of space and time. At this instant t=0 space was infinite in size but the scale factor was zero. I’m picturing it (hopefully correctly) like an excel spreadsheet with infinite...
Back
Top