How SUSY solves the hierarchy problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter Cherry_pie
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Susy
Cherry_pie
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
I'm currently doing a third year project (undergraduate) on supersymmetry, and am slightly confused as to just how the Higgs naturalness problem is solved through adding superparticles to the standard model. I've been advised to include discussion of radiative corrections, which, at most, all i know is they cancel out something which would otherwise send the Higgs mass to infinity. I would like to understand these corrections in greater detail, and be able to explain just how and why this solves the problem. Any help, or even some good links (ive exhausted wikipedia) aimed at people who arent already experts in this field would be greatly appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Thank you so much :-) I haven't read through it all yet, but it certainly looks like it answers my problems, plus a few others!
 
Cherry_pie said:
Thank you so much :-) I haven't read through it all yet, but it certainly looks like it answers my problems, plus a few others!

yes it is a quite delicate set of lecture notes, better than "A Supersymmetry Primer" http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/9709356

and "Supersymmetry in Elementary Particle Physics" http://arxiv.org/abs/0801.1928

the main point (as you have read i pressume) is that fermion and bosons contribute to the Higgs self-energy with opposite signs, and if we have supersymmetry, the fermions and bosons in SM have partners with opposite spin in SUSY which will contribute with opposite sign and this make \delta m_H^2 almost zero and not \Lambda ^2
 
Thread 'LQG Legend Writes Paper Claiming GR Explains Dark Matter Phenomena'
A new group of investigators are attempting something similar to Deur's work, which seeks to explain dark matter phenomena with general relativity corrections to Newtonian gravity is systems like galaxies. Deur's most similar publication to this one along these lines was: One thing that makes this new paper notable is that the corresponding author is Giorgio Immirzi, the person after whom the somewhat mysterious Immirzi parameter of Loop Quantum Gravity is named. I will be reviewing the...
I seem to notice a buildup of papers like this: Detecting single gravitons with quantum sensing. (OK, old one.) Toward graviton detection via photon-graviton quantum state conversion Is this akin to “we’re soon gonna put string theory to the test”, or are these legit? Mind, I’m not expecting anyone to read the papers and explain them to me, but if one of you educated people already have an opinion I’d like to hear it. If not please ignore me. EDIT: I strongly suspect it’s bunk but...
Back
Top