How the atmosphere pressure is generated

AI Thread Summary
Atmospheric pressure is generated by both the weight of air molecules and their thermal motion, resulting in collisions. Molecules are pulled toward Earth's center but remain suspended due to their kinetic energy. At ground level, pressure arises from the continuous impact of air molecules on the surface, with each molecule above exerting weight on those below. The pressure decreases with altitude, as the density of air diminishes exponentially. Ultimately, both weight and collision forces contribute to the overall atmospheric pressure.
ztdep
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Dear friends:
The pressure is generated by the molecular collision or the weight of the air.?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This question is bound to get a lot of people going as both of your alternatives carry some of the truth of the situation. The molecules in the air are all pulled towards the centre of the Earth but do not all fall down because of their thermal motion and the resulting collisions. At the bottom of a column of air (i.e. on the ground) the pressure is die to the adjacent molecules continually hitting the ground. Those molecules, in turn, are collided with by molecules higher up and so on, up tot the edge of the atmosphere ( it would go on for ever, in fact, getting less and less dense in an approximately exponential way). Every molecule in a vertical column will be imposing its weight on the molecules below it so you could say that the pressure is actually caused by the weight of all the molecules overhead. If Earth were cold enough, there would be a 'thin' layer of liquified air all over the surface and the pressure would be easier to appreciate and to calculate but there is no other force available to increase the pressure when it's gaseous so you can say it's still due to weight. Just one caveat and that is that the weight of the molecules at the very limit of the atmosphere is just a bit less (not a lot, of course) than at the surface because they are a couple of hundred km further away.
 
I think the pressure is caused by both the weight and the collision force.
 
sophiecentaur said:
This question is bound to get a lot of people going as both of your alternatives carry some of the truth of the situation. The molecules in the air are all pulled towards the centre of the Earth but do not all fall down because of their thermal motion and the resulting collisions. At the bottom of a column of air (i.e. on the ground) the pressure is die to the adjacent molecules continually hitting the ground. Those molecules, in turn, are collided with by molecules higher up and so on, up tot the edge of the atmosphere ( it would go on for ever, in fact, getting less and less dense in an approximately exponential way). Every molecule in a vertical column will be imposing its weight on the molecules below it so you could say that the pressure is actually caused by the weight of all the molecules overhead. If Earth were cold enough, there would be a 'thin' layer of liquified air all over the surface and the pressure would be easier to appreciate and to calculate but there is no other force available to increase the pressure when it's gaseous so you can say it's still due to weight. Just one caveat and that is that the weight of the molecules at the very limit of the atmosphere is just a bit less (not a lot, of course) than at the surface because they are a couple of hundred km further away.
I think the pressure is caused by both the weight and the collision force.
 
ztdep said:
I think the pressure is caused by both the weight and the collision force.
The "collision force" is there because of the weight. The weight is there because of the gravitational field. If there were no weight, the molecules would just drift off into space so there would be no pressure due to momentum transfer of collisions. Both of the ideas are at work here so it's not an either / or choice.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?

Similar threads

Back
Top