How to Bypass Faraday Cages with DC Pulses?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Deco56
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dc Experience
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around methods to bypass Faraday cages using DC pulses, exploring concepts related to Tesla's non-Hertzian waves, dielectric phenomena, and the behavior of transformers with pulsed currents. Participants share references, challenge each other's views, and express interest in the theoretical implications of these topics.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants inquire about methods to bypass Faraday cages, referencing Tesla's work on non-Hertzian waves and their implications for electrical phenomena.
  • One participant argues that non-Hertzian waves are invalid, asserting that simple conductive Faraday cages do not shield low-frequency magnetic fields, suggesting the need for specialized materials for effective shielding.
  • Another participant defends the validity of non-Hertzian waves, questioning how frequency is defined for DC square waves and challenging the assertion that Tesla's ideas lack merit.
  • Participants discuss the interpretation of Tesla's understanding of electromagnetic theory, with some asserting that he had a significant grasp of electrical phenomena, while others claim he misunderstood key concepts.
  • There are references to historical figures like Steinmetz, with participants debating the implications of his quotes on dielectric fields and the nature of electric and magnetic fields.
  • Some participants express frustration over perceived underestimations of Tesla's contributions and knowledge, while others caution against overestimating his understanding of modern electromagnetic theory.
  • There is a call for more references and responses to support claims made in the discussion, highlighting the contentious nature of the topic.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants exhibit significant disagreement regarding the validity of non-Hertzian waves, Tesla's understanding of electromagnetic theory, and the effectiveness of Faraday cages against various frequencies. No consensus is reached on these issues.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty about the definitions of frequency in the context of DC pulses and the implications of Tesla's theories, indicating a lack of clarity on these technical aspects.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to those exploring unconventional electrical phenomena, historical perspectives on electrical engineering, and the ongoing debates surrounding Tesla's contributions to science.

Deco56
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I have been looking into Tesla's work and his self claimed "non-Hertzian" waves, some called electrostatic or dieletric pressures waves or rays eletric induction (magnetic and dielectric). I am also interestted in negative resistance systems, transiet phenomenon (pulse wave) and non-linear phenomenon.

Firstly, I'd ask for anyone to link any good reference material with regard to these phenomenon.

Second, I am curious of methods to bypass Faraday cages like in this video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wjz-5Lqtxow&sns=em

Any ideas?

Third, I am also interested in the paper I have attached, showing non-typical behaviour of transformers for pulses. Does anyone have similar references or idea why pulsed current exhibit this behaviour. Thanks.

Abnormal Voltages within Transformers - L. F. Blume - AIEE Vol. 38, Part 1, 1919
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Not sure why you think non-hertzian waves are garbage. Nikola Tesla mentioned them in his patents and they are not electromagnetic but magneto-dieletric wave or electrostatic waves or eletric rays of induction as seen in plasma waves (I think Tesla had a good grasp on electrical phenomenon). I still have not received a response as to how he bypasses the Faraday cage? You say it doesn't work on low frequency magnetic fields but how do you define frequency for DC square wave? How do you know what frequency he was using? Again, it is not an electromagnetic wave.

Steinmetz said there are two components or eletric field, magnetic and dieletric...and that the charge on conductor concept destroys analogy of dieletric field, thus we have forgot about it.
 
Deco56 said:
Not sure why you think non-hertzian waves are garbage. Nikola Tesla mentioned them in his patents and they are not electromagnetic but magneto-dieletric wave or electrostatic waves or eletric rays of induction as seen in plasma waves (I think Tesla had a good grasp on electrical phenomenon). I still have not received a response as to how he bypasses the Faraday cage? You say it doesn't work on low frequency magnetic fields but how do you define frequency for DC square wave? How do you know what frequency he was using? Again, it is not an electromagnetic wave.

Telsa didn't have a good grasp on modern electromagnetic theory which is why his ideas on scalar or non-hertzian waves is garbage.

You define frequency by simple analysis like we do with unipolar PWM signals using the pulse duty cycle.
pwm_harmonics.jpg
 
So let me get this straight, Tesla, inventor of AC generator and 300+ patents did not have a good grasp of electromagnetic theory (I would not use the word 'modern' , very few things have changed over the last century in principle). Again, you did not answer how to determine frequency of DC pulse (is it excitation periood, relaxation period or number of pulses per second?) Also, you did not answer how you knew the frequency? He is using pulsed power, not sure how you knew it was low frequency magnetic field (not explicitly stated).

Also, you did not respond to Steinmetz quote ''Unfortunately, to a large extent in dealing with dielectric fields the prehistoric conception of the electro- static charge (electron) on the conductor still exists, and by its use destroys the analogy between the two components of the electric field, the magnetic and the dielectric, and makes the consideration of dielectric fields unnecessarily complicated.''

Steinmetz continues, ''There is obviously no more sense in thinking of the capacity current as current which charges the conductor with a quantity of electricity, than there is of speaking of the inductance voltage as charging the conductor with a quantity of magnetism. But the latter conception, together with the notion of a quantity of magnetism, etc., has vanished since Faraday's representation of the magnetic field by lines of force."
 
Deco56 said:
So let me get this straight, Tesla, inventor of AC generator and 300+ patents did not have a good grasp of electromagnetic theory (I would not use the word 'modern' , very few things have changed over the last century in principle).

https://www.physicsforums.com/showpost.php?p=4801065&postcount=4

This is what I think of the video:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lxFOVtr9fbk
 
Last edited:
http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/tesla/esp_tesla_51.htm

I'm sad that you underestimate his knowledge of electrical phenomenon. If this is not evident from his 300+ patents, inventions and quotes, there is no hope for you, sir.
 
Deco56 said:
http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/tesla/esp_tesla_51.htm

I'm sad that you underestimate his knowledge of electrical phenomenon. If this is not evident from his 300+ patents, inventions and quotes, there is no hope for you, sir.

the problem is ... too many people OVERESTIMATE his knowledge/understanding

Yes he did get a lot of things right, but got a lot blatantly wrong as well
and you have latched onto one of those wrong things

regards
Dave

PS... Ohhh, and a patent doesn't give something credibility or that it will work
people patent ideas all the time without having a functioning prototype
 
Last edited:
That is your opinion, and you have done nothing to prove it so it remains an opinion. Other responses and references are welcome.

I have no underestimated Tesla...you might be forgetting they seized all of his private research when he died...he knew more than you think, mainstream science refuses to accept this...
 
  • #10
Deco56 said:
That is your opinion, and you have done nothing to prove it so it remains an opinion. Other responses and references are welcome.

I have no underestimated Tesla...you might be forgetting they seized all of his private research when he died...he knew more than you think, mainstream science refuses to accept this...

I have nothing to prove
as it is you making the claims

in the mean time I have asked the mentors to review the thread
suggesting it falls into the realm of woowoo science

regards
Dave
 
  • #11
Thread locked pending moderation.
 
  • #12
This is nonsense. Thread will remain locked.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 94 ·
4
Replies
94
Views
14K