MHB How to Calculate Arc Length for a 124° Angle in a Circle?

zolton5971
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
A circle has a radius of 10cm. Find the length s of the arc intercepted by a central angle of 124°
.

Do not round any intermediate computations, and round your answer to the nearest tenth.

How do I do this?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
You will need the formula:

[box=green]
Arc Length of Circular Arc

The arc-length $s$ of the circular arc, where the radius of curvature is $r$, and the subtended angle is $\theta$ (in radians) is given by:

$$s=r\theta\tag{1}$$[/box]

So, you need to convert the given angle to radians (multiply by $$\frac{\pi}{180^{\circ}}$$), and then plug the given data into (1). What do you find?
 
Got that one thanks!
 
zolton5971 said:
Got that one thanks!

The function f is defined by f(x)=x^2+5

Find f(3z)

How do I find f(3z)

You should have found:

$$s=\frac{62\pi}{9}$$

I am going to move your next question to a new thread. :D
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top