How to calculate Fourier Transform of e^-a*|t|?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the Fourier Transform of the function e^{-a*|t|}, where a > 0. Participants explore the definition of the Fourier Transform, the appropriate limits of integration, and the implications of the absolute value in the function.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant attempts to calculate the Fourier Transform by breaking the problem into cases for t > 0 and t < 0, leading to confusion about the results compared to external sources like WolframAlpha.
  • Another participant suggests that there are different definitions of the Fourier Transform, which may account for discrepancies in results.
  • Questions are raised about the limits of integration for both cases of t, with some participants suggesting that g(t) is an even function due to the absolute value, while others challenge this assumption.
  • There is a discussion about whether the integration can be simplified by considering the even nature of g(t) and multiplying the result from 0 to infinity by 2.
  • One participant notes that while g(t) is even, the integrand g(t)e^{j\omega t} is not, which complicates the integration process.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express uncertainty about the correct limits of integration and the implications of the even nature of the function. There is no consensus on the correct approach to the problem, and multiple competing views remain regarding the integration process and the definition of the Fourier Transform.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight potential misunderstandings related to the definitions of the Fourier Transform and the treatment of the absolute value in the function. There are unresolved questions about the integration limits and the behavior of the function for negative values of t.

Nat3
Messages
69
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Calculate (from the definition, no tables allowed) the Fourier Transform of e^{-a*|t|}, where a > 0.

Homework Equations



Fourier Transform:

G(f) = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} g(t)e^{-j\omega t} dt

The Attempt at a Solution



I thought I'd break up the problem into the two cases of t (where it's negative and positive). However, when I calculated the portion where t > 0, I got:

<br /> G(f) = \int_{0}^{\infty} e^{-at} e^{-j\omega t}dt = G(f) = \int_{0}^{\infty} e^{-(j\omega + a)t}dt = \frac{e^{-(j\omega + a)t}}{-(j\omega + a)}\bigg|_0^\infty = 0 - \frac{1}{-(j\omega + a)} = \frac{1}{j\omega + a}<br />

Which is nowhere close to what WolframAlpha says the answer should be:

http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=fourier+transform+exp(-a*abs(t))

So I guess I'm confused on how I should even approach the problem. Any suggestions?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I got closer but not the Wolfram answer. So Wolfram is clearly wrong!

JK. There are two different definitions of the Fourier transform.

What is g(t) for t < 0? What should be the limits of integration?

What is g(t) for t > 0? What should THOSE limits of intetgration be?

You need to rethink your limits of integration.

I got the same answer as Wolfram except for a sqrt(2pi) coefficient. This is probably due to the fact that they define the Fourier transform differently from you.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Thanks for your help!

rude man said:
What is g(t) for t < 0? What should be the limits of integration?

Ah, I guess since there's an absolute value around t, that actually make g(t) an even function? So g(t) is going to be the same equation and Fourier transform for t < 0 and t > 0?

rude man said:
What is g(t) for t > 0? What should THOSE limits of intetgration be?

Shouldn't it be zero to infinity?
 
Nat3 said:
Thanks for your help!



Ah, I guess since there's an absolute value around t, that actually make g(t) an even function? So g(t) is going to be the same equation and Fourier transform for t < 0 and t > 0?

No. If t < 0 but g(t) has to have a negative exponent, what must g(t) be? after all, -a|t| < 0 for a > 0 for ALL t, -∞ < t < ∞.

same question for when t > 0. the exponent must also be negative for all t > 0.
Shouldn't it be zero to infinity?

why? for t < 0 how can the limits of integration go from t=0 to t=∞?
 
rude man said:
No. If t < 0 but g(t) has to have a negative exponent, what must g(t) be? after all, -a|t| < 0 for a > 0 for ALL t, -∞ < t < ∞.

same question for when t > 0. the exponent must also be negative for all t > 0.why? for t < 0 how can the limits of integration go from t=0 to t=∞?

OK, looking at it again, I now realize that g(t) is a decaying exponential, starting at y = 1 and then going down to follow the x-axis. It's an even function because of the absolute value around t, so it's the same on both sides of the y-axis.

Does that mean that I can just do the integration from 0 to infinity on one side and then multiply by 2?
 
I plugged the integral into wolfram alpha and got the same answer as I posted in my original question:

http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=integrate+exp(-alpha*t)*exp(-i*omega*t)+from+0+to+infinity

Unless I'm just forgetting basic integration rules, it seems like since the function is the same on both sides of the y-axis that I can simply multiply the above by 2 to get the integral from -inf to +inf, which gives:

G(f) = \frac{2}{j\omega + \alpha}

Which is not the correct answer.

What am I doing wrong? Can anyone help?
 
Not quite. The function g(t) is even but you are integrating g(t)e^{j\omega t} which isn't even, so you need to do the other half of the integral, or notice that the negative time part is the complex conjugate of the positive time part.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
9K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K