How to Calculate Relative Rates of Change with a*v=s*w?

  • Thread starter Thread starter flash9286
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Change Relative
AI Thread Summary
To calculate relative rates of change using the equation a*v=s*w, one can manipulate the expression by substituting (a+δa), (s+δs), (v+δv), and (w+δw). This leads to the relationship δa/a + δv/v = δs/s + δw/w. Understanding this transformation is key to grasping the underlying principles of relative rates of change. The discussion clarifies that the equation holds true for various choices of the variables involved. Ultimately, the explanation provided helped the participants reach a clear understanding of the concept.
flash9286
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
if you have a*v=s*w how do you get:

delta a/a+delta v/v=delta s/s+delta w/w

can anybody explain why this is true.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Well, fiddle about with the expression:
(a+\delta{a})(v+\delta{v})=(s+\delta{s})(w+\delta{w})
 
I'm sorry I don't follow
 
What do you not follow?
Do you not understand that the equation av=sw holds for different choices of "a", "s", "v" and "w", including the choices (a+\delta{a}),(s+\delta{s}),(v+\delta{v}),(w+\delta{w})?
 
Nevermind I got it. Thanks for your help
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top