How to Calculate Relative Rates of Change with a*v=s*w?

  • Thread starter Thread starter flash9286
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Change Relative
AI Thread Summary
To calculate relative rates of change using the equation a*v=s*w, one can manipulate the expression by substituting (a+δa), (s+δs), (v+δv), and (w+δw). This leads to the relationship δa/a + δv/v = δs/s + δw/w. Understanding this transformation is key to grasping the underlying principles of relative rates of change. The discussion clarifies that the equation holds true for various choices of the variables involved. Ultimately, the explanation provided helped the participants reach a clear understanding of the concept.
flash9286
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
if you have a*v=s*w how do you get:

delta a/a+delta v/v=delta s/s+delta w/w

can anybody explain why this is true.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Well, fiddle about with the expression:
(a+\delta{a})(v+\delta{v})=(s+\delta{s})(w+\delta{w})
 
I'm sorry I don't follow
 
What do you not follow?
Do you not understand that the equation av=sw holds for different choices of "a", "s", "v" and "w", including the choices (a+\delta{a}),(s+\delta{s}),(v+\delta{v}),(w+\delta{w})?
 
Nevermind I got it. Thanks for your help
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Back
Top