How to Calculate Underwater Force for Displacement?

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the underwater force required for one object to displace another, consider the dynamics of the collision, including the velocities of both objects and the forces acting on the displaced object. Key forces to account for include buoyancy, drag, and potentially lift, all of which depend on the object's shape and velocity relative to water currents. The problem can be approached through numerical integration to determine the acceleration and velocity needed for the displaced object to reach the surface. While there isn't a single equation to solve this, it is a solvable problem through iterative calculations. Understanding these principles is essential for accurately modeling underwater displacements.
IustitiaPrime
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
I'm trying to determine the force needed for one object to displace another object underwater. Specifically, Object A strikes Object B hard enough to jettison it from the seafloor up to sea level/land, let's say the Pacific coastline. I have a timeframe in mind, density & mass of the two objects, and distance traveled, yet don't know how to apply these factors under the liquid medium of the sea and the pressures involved. I'm not asking for easy answers so much as perhaps an equation to simplify things a bit to calculate either the force required to achieve such a feat or the energy output such a collision would yield.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm having trouble visualizing what you are asking about. It is like underwater billiards?
 
If we assume that Object A strikes Object B hard enough to push it free from the seafloor with a velocity:

1) Note that velocity and speed are not the same: https://www.physicsclassroom.com/class/1DKin/Lesson-1/Speed-and-Velocity.

2) After Object B is free from the seafloor with a velocity, it is subject to forces:

2a) A buoyancy force. Search buoyancy force for more information.
2b) A drag force. Search drag force and drag coefficient for more information.
2c) Depending on the shape of Object B, there may be a lift force. Search lift coefficient for more information.
2d) Ocean currents. The lift and drag forces are functions of the object velocity relative to the local water velocity and the object shape.
2e) Acceleration force.

Since these forces sum to zero, the remaining unknown is the acceleration. Then you integrate all of the above until the object gets to wherever it gets. It's an easy numerical integration, but difficult to impossible to do it analytically. You get your answer by writing a program to solve the problem for a given Object B velocity, then iterate that velocity (both speed and direction) until you are satisfied with the answer. Then calculate the Object A velocity needed to get the Object B velocity that you found.

A collision has energy output if it sets off an explosive. Otherwise, it results in some combination of energy exchange and/or energy dissipation.

End result is there is no single equation, but it is a solvable problem.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top