How to deduce the solution of normal modes of a cavity?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on deducing the solution of normal modes of a cavity as presented in equation (1.1.5) of "Quantum Optics" by Scully and Zubairy. The solution takes the form of ##Sin(kx)##, where ##k=\frac{j\pi}{L}## for integer values of ##j##. The coefficients ##A_j## and ##q_j## are introduced to relate cavity modes to mechanical simple harmonic motion (SHM) oscillators, ensuring dimensional consistency between electric field units and distance. The derivation leads to an expression for the total energy of cavity radiation, which is analogous to a system of independent mechanical oscillators, as shown in equation (1.1.9).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum optics principles
  • Familiarity with simple harmonic motion (SHM) mechanics
  • Knowledge of wave functions and their representations
  • Basic grasp of dimensional analysis in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of normal modes in quantum optics
  • Explore the relationship between mechanical oscillators and electromagnetic waves
  • Investigate the implications of dimensional consistency in physical equations
  • Review the energy expressions for cavity modes in quantum systems
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in quantum optics, physicists studying cavity modes, and anyone interested in the mathematical foundations of electromagnetic wave behavior in confined spaces.

Tspirit
Messages
50
Reaction score
6

Homework Statement


In the book "Quantum Optics" written by Scully and Zubairy, there is an equation (1.1.5). The equation is presented directly and not explained how to be deduced. The content is as follows.

Homework Equations


upload_2016-12-7_11-57-6.png

upload_2016-12-7_11-57-22.png

The Attempt at a Solution


I know the solution should have the form of ##Sin(kx)##, where ##k=\frac{j\pi}{L},j=1,2,3,...## . But I don't know how to get the coefficients ##A## and ##q##.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Exploit orthogonality of the modes and your knowledge of the physics being described.
 
The coefficient of ##\sin(k_jz)## in (1.1.5) is written as ##A_j q_j## just for convenience in order to relate the cavity modes to mechanical SHM oscillators (i.e., point masses oscillating in SHM). The analogous point mass ##m_j## has displacement ##q_j## , where ##q_j## has units of distance. But the left side of equation 1.1.5 has units of electric field. Thus, one reason for the factor ##A_j## is to make the units come out right. ##A_j## must have units of electric field / distance. You should check that this is, in fact, the case.

The particular form chosen for ##A_j## leads to a nice expression for the energy of the cavity modes as given in 1.1.9 on page 4. See
https://www.amazon.com/dp/0521435951/?tag=pfamazon01-20
The total energy of the cavity radiation is expressed as the sum of the energies of a system of independent mechanical oscillators.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes Tspirit
TSny said:
The coefficient of ##\sin(k_jz)## in (1.1.5) is written as ##A_j q_j## just for convenience in order to relate the cavity modes to mechanical SHM oscillators (i.e., point masses oscillating in SHM). The analogous point mass ##m_j## has displacement ##q_j## , where ##q_j## has units of distance. But the left side of equation 1.1.5 has units of electric field. Thus, one reason for the factor ##A_j## is to make the units come out right. ##A_j## must have units of electric field / distance. You should check that this is, in fact, the case.

The particular form chosen for ##A_j## leads to a nice expression for the energy of the cavity modes as given in 1.1.9 on page 4. See
https://www.amazon.com/dp/0521435951/?tag=pfamazon01-20
The total energy of the cavity radiation is expressed as the sum of the energies of a system of independent mechanical oscillators.
I maybe have understood it. For a SHM oscillator, its position is given by $$x(t)=x_{m}Sin(kt),$$ where ##x_{m}## is the amplitude of the oscillation, and ##k## is the natural oscillating frequency.For the cavity modes, it is actually a wave describing by $$x(z,t)=x(t)Sin(kz),$$ where ##x(t)## is the position at ##t## and stands for the amplitude of the wave and in some way the energy. There are many possible normal waves (or modes) with different amplitude (i.e. ##x(t)##) and wave numbers (i.e. ##k##) for a universal electromagnetic wave, so it should be a superposition of all of possible normal wave. It follows that $$x(z,t)=\underset{j}{\sum A_{j}}x_{j}(t)Sin(k_{j}z),$$ where ##A_{j}## is the normalization coefficient. Substituting ##x(z,t)## and ##x_{j}(t)## respectively with ##E(z,t)## and ##q_{j}(t)##, we get $$E(z,t)=\underset{j}{\sum A_{j}}q_{j}(t)Sin(k_{j}z).$$ This is Eq. (1.1.5). QED
However, the coefficient ##A_{j}## is not determined in the derivation above. Maybe it is like TSny said that for convenience to leads to a nice expression for the energy of the cavity modes as given in Eq. (1.1.9): $$H=\frac{1}{2}\underset{j}{\sum}(mv_{j}^{2}q_{j}^{2}+m_{j}\dot{q}_{j}^{2}).$$
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
9K
Replies
10
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
5K