How to define an 'infinite dimensional integral'

Hello, my question is how could we define integration on infinite dimensional spaces?, my idea is, let be the multiple integral.

[tex] \int_{V}dVf(X) [/tex] where [tex] X=(x_1 ,x_2 , x_3 ,.....,x_n ) [/tex]

then i define a family of trial functions, in my case they are just 'step functions' so [tex] H(X)=H(x_1) H(x_2 ) H(x_3 ).....H(x_n) [/tex] and define a some kind of axiomatic integral for htem (i don't know how unfortunately) then i try to apply integration by parts so integral hold to and make n -> infinite so we define an infinite dimensional integral.

By the way, is there an analogue to Euler-Mc Laurin sum formula for infinite dimensional spaces?
 

HallsofIvy

Science Advisor
Homework Helper
41,728
881

dextercioby

Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
12,960
536
Unfortunately the second article is not free, unless you have a paid subscription to Elsevier.

Daniel.
 
But the infinite dimensional derivative (functional derivative) can be defined for a functional in 2 ways:

[tex] \frac{F[\phi +\epsilon \delta (x-y)]-F[\phi]}{\epsilon} [/tex] or

[tex] \frac{dF[\phi +\epsilon (x-y)]}{d\epsilon} [/tex]

for epsilon tending to 0, and it yields to Euler-Lagrange equation, the question is why can't we define the integral by means perhaps of the sum, with epsilon tending to 0 in the form?

[tex] \sum_{n=0}^{\infty}\epsilon F[\phi +n\epsilon \delta (x-y)] [/tex] or if we denote the functional derivative operator [tex] \delta [/tex] then its inverse is just the functional integral operator .
 
Last edited:

Related Threads for: How to define an 'infinite dimensional integral'

  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
15
Views
15K
  • Last Post
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
955
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Top