How to Demonstrate That These Limits Go to Infinity?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around demonstrating that certain limits approach infinity, specifically the limits of the forms lim (3^n - n) and lim (a^n / n^k) for natural numbers a and k, where a > 1. Participants explore various methods of proof and reasoning related to these limits.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant asserts that lim (3^n - n) goes to infinity and seeks a demonstration of this limit.
  • Another participant proposes a method involving the convergence of the series ∑ (n^k / a^n) to show that lim (a^n / n^k) approaches infinity.
  • A different participant requests a more straightforward proof that does not involve series.
  • One participant suggests defining a function f(x) = a^x / x^k and showing that it has a minimum point after which the derivative is always positive, implying the function is increasing.
  • Another participant challenges the assumption that a function with a positive derivative after a minimum necessarily tends to infinity, providing a counterexample.
  • Further discussion includes the importance of asymptotic behavior, with one participant indicating that the absence of asymptotes supports the conclusion that the function tends to infinity.
  • One participant expresses confusion about how to conclude that the function tends to infinity based on the established properties of the function.
  • A participant shares a perspective on analyzing the limit of ratios, suggesting that as n increases, the growth of the numerator outpaces that of the denominator.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the methods of proof or the implications of the properties of the functions discussed. Multiple competing views and approaches remain throughout the discussion.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express uncertainty regarding the implications of the properties of functions with positive derivatives and the role of asymptotes in determining the behavior of limits. There are unresolved mathematical steps in the proofs proposed.

joao_pimentel
Messages
68
Reaction score
0
Hi guys

I know this limit goes to infinity

[tex]lim (3^n-n)[/tex]
But how do I demonstrate it?

Actually I know also that this type of limits goes to infinity

[tex]lim \frac{a^n}{n^k},\forall a,k \in \mathbb{N},a>1[/tex]
But I don't know how to prove it

May you kindly help me?

Many thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
joao_pimentel said:
Hi guys

I know this limit goes to infinity

[tex]lim (3^n-n)[/tex]
But how do I demonstrate it?

Actually I know also that this type of limits goes to infinity

[tex]lim \frac{a^n}{n^k},\forall a,k \in \mathbb{N},a>1[/tex]
But I don't know how to prove it

May you kindly help me?

Many thanks



One glamorous way to prove it:

1) this is a positive sequence;

2) the series [itex]\displaystyle{\sum_{n=1}^\infty \frac{n^k}{a^n}}\,\,[/itex] converges (D'alembert or Cauchy n-root test, say), thus [itex]\,\,\displaystyle{\frac{n^k}{a^n}\to_{n\to\infty} 0}[/itex] , so...

DonAntonio
 
Very interesting :) Really

Is there any other proof, more common and less glamorous (without going into series)?
 
joao_pimentel said:
Very interesting :) Really

Is there any other proof, more common and less glamorous (without going into series)?



Another way: define [itex]f(x):=\frac{a^x}{x^k}\,\,[/itex], show this function has a min. at some point, after which the derivative is always

positive and thus the function's ascending, and since the function's always positive...

DonAntonio
 
But functions whose derivative is always positive after a certain minimum, don't mean they tend to infinity...

For example:

[tex]f(x)=-e^{-x}+1, x\geq 0[/tex]
[tex]f(x)=-x, x<0[/tex]

has a minimum at x=0 and after that is always ascending, though it tends to x=1
 
joao_pimentel said:
But functions whose derivative is always positive after a certain minimum, don't mean they tend to infinity...


Neither did I say so nor even hinted at it. Please do read again what I wrote, in particular the "always positive" thingy.

DonAntonio ***


For example:

[tex]f(x)=-e^{-x}+1, x\geq 0[/tex]
[tex]f(x)=-x, x<0[/tex]

has a minimum at x=0 and after that is always ascending, though it tends to x=1

...
 
Maybe with the second derivative which gives the concavity...
 
Thank you DonAntonio

I really apologise but I can't see the big picture...

Facts:

1. The function has a minimum at certain point
2. After that minimum the derivative is always positive
3. The function is always positive, i.e. f(x)>0, for all x in R

How do I conclude that it tends to infinity?

Sorry to bother...

Thank you very much
 
joao_pimentel said:
Thank you DonAntonio

I really apologise but I can't see the big picture...

Facts:

1. The function has a minimum at certain point
2. After that minimum the derivative is always positive
3. The function is always positive, i.e. f(x)>0, for all x in R

How do I conclude that it tends to infinity?

Sorry to bother...

Thank you very much



Well, I intended for you to complete the picture: since the function I used has no oblicuous and/or horizontal asymptotes, and since it is

always positive, if after some definite point is derivative is positive then the function must an ascending after that point, so

it MUST tend to [tex]\infty[/tex]

DonAntonio
 
  • #10
Thank you very much DonAntonio

I confess I was not reaching the part of the asymptotes...

Thank you so very much indeed

Greetings from Lisbon

João
 
  • #11
joao_pimentel said:
Thank you very much DonAntonio

I confess I was not reaching the part of the asymptotes...

Thank you so very much indeed

Greetings from Lisbon

João



Foi un prazer para mim.

DonAntonio
 
  • #12
Muito obrigado mesmo pela atenção

Melhores cumprimentos
 
  • #13
The way I like to think about these kinds of ratios (an/nk) is by using this:
[tex]\lim_{n\to \infty} \left( \frac{n+1}{n} \right)^k = 1[/tex]
So when n is a large enough number, an/nk might be very small, we don't know. But each time I increase n by one after this point, the numerator increases by a factor of a, and the denominator increases by a factor which is very close to 1 (say, less than a1/2). From that point on the value of an/nk grows by a factor of at least a1/2 each time you increase n by one
 
  • #14
Very interesting thought, thank you very much...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
6K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K