How to derive the reflected Mach number relationship?

In summary, the conversation discusses the calculation of the reflected mach number (Mr) when learning about reflected waves in elementary gas dynamics. The important jump condition is the velocity jump, and it is recommended to change the frame of reference to one with a stationary shock. The textbook by Anderson does not provide the derivation, but it can be derived by following the two rules mentioned.
  • #1
theudster
3
0
TL;DR Summary
Deriving reflected mach number relationship
Hi,

when learnig about reflected waves, I keep coming up with this equation;
1589803143295.png

to calculate the reflected mach number (Mr).
I can't seem to find the derivation for this and would appreciate your help

Thank you
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
This is honestly one of the trickier topics in elementary gas dynamics. There are a few general rules you should keep in mind:
  1. Always change your frame of reference to one with a stationary shock, where possible.
  2. For situations like this, the important jump condition is the velocity jump, ##u_2/u_1##.
If you keep those in mind, you can solve for the ratio for the incident shock and then for the reflected shock and relate the two. The terms under the radical come from normal shock relations. It's not really something that makes a lot of sense to reproduce here in full, though. Do you have a relevant textbook handy?
 
  • Like
Likes Astronuc
  • #3
boneh3ad said:
This is honestly one of the trickier topics in elementary gas dynamics. There are a few general rules you should keep in mind:
  1. Always change your frame of reference to one with a stationary shock, where possible.
  2. For situations like this, the important jump condition is the velocity jump, ##u_2/u_1##.
If you keep those in mind, you can solve for the ratio for the incident shock and then for the reflected shock and relate the two. The terms under the radical come from normal shock relations. It's not really something that makes a lot of sense to reproduce here in full, though. Do you have a relevant textbook handy?
I have Compressible FLow by Anderson, but he doesn't provide the derivation
 
  • #4
Anderson also says "the derivation is left as an exercise for the reader." If you follow along with that chapter and follow the two rules I mentioned, you ought to be able to derive this on your own. It's a good exercise.
 
  • Like
Likes Astronuc

1. How do you derive the reflected Mach number relationship?

The reflected Mach number relationship can be derived using the conservation of mass, momentum, and energy equations for a normal shock wave. This relationship is also known as the Prandtl-Meyer equation.

2. What are the assumptions made when deriving the reflected Mach number relationship?

The assumptions made include: 1) the flow is isentropic, 2) the shock wave is normal to the flow, 3) the flow is inviscid, and 4) the flow is one-dimensional.

3. How is the reflected Mach number related to the incident Mach number?

The reflected Mach number is directly related to the incident Mach number, with a higher incident Mach number resulting in a higher reflected Mach number. The relationship between the two can be described by the Prandtl-Meyer equation.

4. What is the significance of the reflected Mach number relationship in supersonic flow?

The reflected Mach number relationship is important in supersonic flow as it allows us to predict the flow properties, such as the Mach number and flow angle, after a normal shock wave. This is crucial in designing and analyzing supersonic flow systems.

5. Are there any limitations to the reflected Mach number relationship?

Yes, the reflected Mach number relationship is only valid for normal shock waves and does not apply to oblique shock waves. It also assumes an ideal gas and does not account for real gas effects. Additionally, it is only applicable to one-dimensional flow and does not consider any three-dimensional effects.

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
908
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Aerospace Engineering
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
15
Views
209
  • Aerospace Engineering
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
105
Back
Top