How to derive the reflected Mach number relationship?

AI Thread Summary
To derive the reflected Mach number relationship, it's essential to change to a stationary shock frame of reference and focus on the velocity jump condition. The ratio of velocities for the incident and reflected shocks can be solved using these principles. Normal shock relations provide the necessary terms for the derivation. Although the textbook "Compressible Flow" by Anderson does not explicitly provide the derivation, it encourages readers to work through the concepts. Following these guidelines will facilitate understanding and deriving the reflected Mach number.
theudster
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
TL;DR Summary
Deriving reflected mach number relationship
Hi,

when learnig about reflected waves, I keep coming up with this equation;
1589803143295.png

to calculate the reflected mach number (Mr).
I can't seem to find the derivation for this and would appreciate your help

Thank you
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This is honestly one of the trickier topics in elementary gas dynamics. There are a few general rules you should keep in mind:
  1. Always change your frame of reference to one with a stationary shock, where possible.
  2. For situations like this, the important jump condition is the velocity jump, ##u_2/u_1##.
If you keep those in mind, you can solve for the ratio for the incident shock and then for the reflected shock and relate the two. The terms under the radical come from normal shock relations. It's not really something that makes a lot of sense to reproduce here in full, though. Do you have a relevant textbook handy?
 
  • Like
Likes Astronuc
boneh3ad said:
This is honestly one of the trickier topics in elementary gas dynamics. There are a few general rules you should keep in mind:
  1. Always change your frame of reference to one with a stationary shock, where possible.
  2. For situations like this, the important jump condition is the velocity jump, ##u_2/u_1##.
If you keep those in mind, you can solve for the ratio for the incident shock and then for the reflected shock and relate the two. The terms under the radical come from normal shock relations. It's not really something that makes a lot of sense to reproduce here in full, though. Do you have a relevant textbook handy?
I have Compressible FLow by Anderson, but he doesn't provide the derivation
 
Anderson also says "the derivation is left as an exercise for the reader." If you follow along with that chapter and follow the two rules I mentioned, you ought to be able to derive this on your own. It's a good exercise.
 
  • Like
Likes Astronuc
Due to the constant never ending supply of "cool stuff" happening in Aerospace these days I'm creating this thread to consolidate posts every time something new comes along. Please feel free to add random information if its relevant. So to start things off here is the SpaceX Dragon launch coming up shortly, I'll be following up afterwards to see how it all goes. :smile: https://blogs.nasa.gov/spacex/
Back
Top