How to Determine Group from Commutation Relations?

geoduck
Messages
257
Reaction score
2
Is there a way to determine the group from the commutation relations?

For example, the commutation relations:

[J_x,J_y]=i\sqrt{2} J_z
[J_y,J_z]=\frac{i}{\sqrt{2}} J_x
[J_z,J_x]=i\sqrt{2} J_y

is actually SO(3), as can be seen by redefining J'_x =\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} J_x: then J'_x, J_y and J_z have the SO(3) algebra. So the commutation relations above is SO(3). But how do we know that just by looking at it?

When you start taking linear combinations of generators, including sometimes with complex coefficients as in J_x+iJ_y, how can you tell the resulting commutators are SO(3)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can see if the <algebra closes>, in other words, if you want to have a Lie algebra, you need to have some requirements there: Leibniz derivation + Jacobi identity. If they fail, then the generators need to be adjusted (by rescaling or by considering linear combinations of them). Then you'll get the Lie algebra. By exponentiation, you get the connected component of the Lie group which is at least locally isomorphic to the Lie group you're really after.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71
dextercioby said:
You can see if the <algebra closes>, in other words, if you want to have a Lie algebra, you need to have some requirements there: Leibniz derivation + Jacobi identity. If they fail, then the generators need to be adjusted (by rescaling or by considering linear combinations of them). Then you'll get the Lie algebra. By exponentiation, you get the connected component of the Lie group which is at least locally isomorphic to the Lie group you're really after.

Can Jacobi Identity and Leibniz derivation alone tell you what group it is?

For example, take the SO(3) commutation relations. If you change [Jx,Jy]=iJz to [Jx,Jy]=-iJz and leave all other commutators the same, then I think you get something like SO(2,1) rather than SO(3). SO(2,1) would still obey things like the Jacobi identity.

So if I have 3 generators and 3 commutation relations, how do I know what group these generators belong to when you can always rescale and take linear combinations?
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top