How to Determine if a Differential Form is Exact

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around determining whether a given differential form is exact, specifically focusing on the function z=xy-y+lnx+2 and its total differential dz. Participants explore the definitions and conditions for exact differentials, including the use of partial derivatives.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • One participant asks how to show that dz is the exact differential of the function z=xy-y+lnx+2.
  • Another participant provides the definition of the total differential and questions the correctness of the expression for dz based on partial derivatives.
  • A participant expresses belief in the correctness of dz based on their use of partial differentials.
  • One participant inquires about the derivative of ln(x), which is later confirmed as 1/x.
  • A participant asserts that once the derivative of ln(x) is corrected, dz qualifies as an exact differential by definition.
  • Another participant elaborates on the conditions for a differential form to be exact, discussing the equality of mixed partial derivatives.
  • Participants discuss the process of finding the function z from the differential form, including integrating with respect to y and addressing the constant of integration that may depend on x.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the definition of exact differentials and the process of verifying them through partial derivatives. However, there are varying levels of confidence regarding the correctness of the initial expression for dz, and the discussion includes corrections and clarifications without reaching a consensus on the initial claim.

Contextual Notes

Some assumptions about the correctness of the initial expression for dz remain unverified, and the discussion touches on the dependence of the constant of integration on x, which is not fully resolved.

zeshkani
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
how would i show that this is the exact differential

z=xy-y+lnx+2
dz= (y+ 0)dx + (x-1)dy (i hope the total differential is right)

so how would i show that dz is the exact differential ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The definition of the total differential of a function f(x,y) is the expression

[tex]df=\frac{\partial f}{\partial x}dx+\frac{\partial f}{\partial y}dy[/tex]

Now with the z you're given, is the expression for dz correct? That is to say, is

[tex]\frac{\partial z}{\partial x}=(y+0)[/tex]

and

[tex]\frac{\partial z}{\partial y}=(x-1)[/tex]

??
 
i believe dz is correct because i used partial differentials to solve it, and i hope its correct
 
what is the derivative of ln(x)?
 
Once you fixed the derivative of ln x thing, the fact that dz is the total derivative of z pretty much means it is an "exact" differential. That's the definition of "exact" differential!
 
thx and the derivative of lnx is just 1/x
 
Yes.
z=xy-y+lnx+2 so
dz= (y+ 1/x)dx + (x-1)dy

And that is an "exact" differential precisely because it is the differential of z.

Now suppose you were given the differential form (y+ 1/x)dx+ (x- 1)dy without having been given z. How would you determine whether it was an exact differential?
If
[tex](y+ 1/x)= \frac{\partial z}{\partial x}[/tex]
for some function z and
[tex]x-1= \frac{\partial z}{\partial y}[/tex]
then
[tex]\frac{\partial(y+ 1/x)}{\partial y}= \frac{\partial^2 z}{\partial x\partial y}[/tex]
and
[tex]\frac{\partial(x-1)}{\partial x}= \frac{\partial^2 z}{\partial y\partial x}[/tex]
and so must be equal. Fortunately, it is easy to see that each second derivative is 1 and so they are in fact equal.
Okay, now, how would we find z? Knowing that
[tex]x-1= \frac{\partial z}{\partial y}[/tex]
integrating with respect to y (treating x as a constant) we get z= xy- y+ C, except that, since we are treating x as a constant, that "constant of integration", C, may depend on x: z= xy- y+ C(x). Differentiating that with respect to x,
[tex]\frac{\partial z}{\partial x}= y+ C'(x)= y+ 1/x[/tex]
Notice that the "y" terms cancel (it was the "cross condition" above that guarenteed that) and so we have C'(x)= 1/x. Then C(x)= ln(x)+ C where "C" now really is a constant.
Any z(x,y)= xy- y+ ln(x)+ C satisfies dz= (y+ 1/x)dx+ (x-1)dy.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K