How to Determine n for Quantized Energies in a Pendulum?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on determining the integer value of n for quantized energies in a simple pendulum with a length of 0.6 m and a bob mass of 0.5 kg. The energy levels are defined by the equation En = (n + 1/2)hf0, where hf0 represents the quantization of energy. The user initially attempted to solve for n using the equation .0009(En+1) = En but encountered negative, non-integer results. After revising the approach to En+1 = En * 1.0001, the user calculated n to be approximately 9999.5, leading to the conclusion that n should be rounded to 10000.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics concepts, particularly quantized energy levels.
  • Familiarity with simple harmonic motion and pendulum dynamics.
  • Proficiency in algebraic manipulation and solving equations.
  • Knowledge of the Planck constant and its application in energy quantization.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of quantized energy levels in harmonic oscillators.
  • Learn about the implications of quantum mechanics on classical systems.
  • Explore the relationship between frequency and energy in oscillatory systems.
  • Investigate the significance of rounding in mathematical solutions and its impact on physical interpretations.
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, particularly those studying quantum mechanics and oscillatory motion, as well as educators looking for examples of quantization in real-world systems.

w3390
Messages
341
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A simple pendulum has a length equal to 0.6 m and has a bob that has a mass equal to 0.5 kg. The energy of this oscillator is quantized, and the allowed values of energy are given by En = (n + 1/2)hf0, where n is an integer and f0 is the frequency of the pendulum. Find n such that En+1 exceeds En by 0.010 percent.

Homework Equations



En=(n+1/2)hf0

The Attempt at a Solution



I thought this sounded like a simple algebra problem, so I set .0009(En+1)=En and solved for n after plugging in the equations. I know there is something wrong with this equation because I keep getting negative, non-integer values for n but I cannot figure out what is wrong. Any help is greatly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Since my first post, I have tried a revised approach. This time I have En+1=En*1.0001. This gives me (n+1)+(1/2)=(n+(1/2))1.0001. After doing all the algebra, I am getting 9999.5 as my answer for n. Since the question asks for an integer value, I do not know if show input 9999 as my answer or if my answer is just wrong in general.
 
Your second method looks fine, and I would round 9999.5 up to 10000.:approve:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K