How to determine when compressible flow is choked?

  • Thread starter Thread starter MysticDream
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Compressible flow
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

In compressible flow, choking occurs at the minimum cross-sectional area, or throat, when the upstream to downstream pressure ratio is 0.528 for air. The introduction of a diverging section after the throat allows for a lower pressure ratio while still achieving choked flow, countering initial assumptions about flow dynamics. The presence of a normal shock can influence flow characteristics, and the geometry of the divergent section significantly affects the flow rate and velocity at the exit. Understanding these principles is crucial for optimizing nozzle design in fluid dynamics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Compressible flow theory
  • Choked flow dynamics
  • Normal shock wave behavior
  • Nozzle design principles
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the effects of area ratios on normal shock locations in compressible flow.
  • Learn about the impact of divergent nozzle sections on flow rate and velocity.
  • Investigate methods for calculating flow rates based on exit geometry and pressure conditions.
  • Explore advanced topics in fluid dynamics, such as oblique shocks and expansion fans.
USEFUL FOR

Aerospace engineers, mechanical engineers, and fluid dynamics researchers seeking to enhance their understanding of compressible flow and nozzle design.

MysticDream
Messages
112
Reaction score
9
TL;DR
Seeking clarification on the behavior of gas flow through venturi tubes and converging diverging nozzles and ducts.
In a compressible flow there is a critical pressure ratio between the upstream and downstream stagnation pressures in order for the flow to become choked, which always happens at the minimum cross-sectional area, or throat. In a duct (or nozzle) that only converges and exits to a stagnation environment, the downstream pressure, for air, would have to be .528 times the upstream pressure as I understand.

However, it is said that with a diverging section of duct (or nozzle) after the throat, the upstream to downstream pressure ratio can be much lower and still result in a choked condition.

This seems counterintuitive as this would mean the velocity and flow rate for a given converging nozzle with a subsonic flow rate could be increased by simple adding a diverging section. How does this work? Does the diverging section kind of redirect the gas in the direction of the flow and thus "pull" more on the throat section? If so, then the angle and size of the diverging section would affect the flow, it seems. If the diverging section had a sharp angle and large diameter, at what point is it no different than not having a diverging section at all? Is there a limiting angle that would prevent the diverging section from having an effect on the flow? Any insight would be appreciated.
 
Last edited:
Engineering news on Phys.org
MysticDream said:
the upstream to downstream pressure ratio can be much lower
The pressure is much lower in the divergent part but the throat pressure ratio is still 0.528.

Flow-with-a-shock-wave-inside-a-convergent-divergent-nozzle-2.ppm
MysticDream said:
This seems counterintuitive as this would mean the velocity and flow rate for a given converging nozzle with a subsonic flow rate could be increased by simple adding a diverging section.
The velocity increases in the divergent part but not the [mass] flow rate as it is still choked at the throat.

MysticDream said:
How does this work?
At one point, a normal shock will appear to reequilibrate everything (d, e, or f in the next image).

?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FmoVbWmL.png

The location where the normal shock appears is a function of the area ratio. Even if you have no divergent part per se, you still have a transition when changing suddenly areas in a duct. The normal shock will thus always appear at the apparent sudden change. The shock might be "oblique" or as an expansion fan at the sudden area change, depending on the larger area pressure.

Figure-4-Shock-wave-arrangements-in-CD-nozzles.png
(source)​
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: MysticDream and Lnewqban
1717977889957.png


Thanks for the detailed explanation. There's one thing I'm still trying to wrap my head around. Say the nozzle ended at point 2 and there is no divergent part (the exit is point 2). The only way for the velocity to reach mach 1 at point 2 is for the external pressure to be .528 * p1. Now lets add the divergent part back on and the exit is at the receiver. Now all of a sudden the external pressure can be much higher (higher than critical), yet the velocity at point 2 can still reach mach 1. This is shown in curve "c" on the graph. If we maintained this higher external pressure and again took away the divergent part, the velocity at point 2 has now reduced because the external pressure is higher than .528 * p1. If this is all correct, then indeed, simply adding the divergent part of the nozzle increased the velocity at point 2 and the overall mass flow rate. Correct me if I'm wrong.

Now assuming this description is correct, and we're maintaining this higher external (exit) pressure, flowing according to curve "c", what would then happen if the diameter at point 3 increased significantly in steps and at each step the flow rate was recorded? It seems at some point that the diameter and angle of the divergent section would increase so much that the velocity at point 2 would decrease because you're approaching having no divergent section at all, in which case, again the external (exit) pressure would have to be critical for the throat to reach mach 1. So there seems to be a limit here, and I'm trying to figure out what that is and how to calculate it.

To calculate the overall flow rate, it seems to me that first the geometry of the exit (or receiver) area has to be taken into account. Then the exit pressure and initial upstream (stagnation) pressure and temperature. Then, knowing the throat area, you should be able to calculate the flow rate.
 
Last edited:
jack action said:
Sorry I did not answer this thread sooner, PF did not send me a notification for a new reply. I'm guessing the discussion continued...
Yes sir, and I appreciate you sharing your knowledge. No problem.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jack action

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
6K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
6K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K