How to distinguish r and gamma, w and omega, v and nu?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Haorong Wu
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gamma Omega
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on distinguishing between similar-looking Greek and Latin letters in mathematical contexts, specifically r and γ, w and ω, v and ν, and υ. Participants emphasize the importance of understanding conventions and contexts to avoid confusion, particularly in handwritten notes. They recommend familiarizing oneself with the Greek alphabet and adhering to common conventions in notation to enhance clarity in communication. Additionally, the discussion highlights the need for textbooks to define symbols and conventions clearly to aid comprehension.

PREREQUISITES
  • Familiarity with the Greek alphabet and its symbols
  • Understanding of mathematical notation in physics and engineering
  • Experience with LaTeX for typesetting mathematical formulas
  • Knowledge of common conventions in scientific writing
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Greek alphabet and its applications in mathematics and physics
  • Learn about LaTeX typesetting for clear mathematical communication
  • Research common conventions for symbols in various scientific disciplines
  • Explore resources that list symbols and their meanings in physics, such as this reference
USEFUL FOR

Students, educators, and professionals in physics, mathematics, and engineering who need to accurately interpret and communicate mathematical symbols and notation.

Haorong Wu
Messages
419
Reaction score
90
How to distinguish ##r## and ##\gamma##, ##w## and ##\omega##, ##v## and ##\nu## and ##\upsilon##?

They look very similar. Are there some rules that I should use one of them in some specific cases?
 
  • Skeptical
Likes   Reactions: weirdoguy
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Haorong Wu said:
How to distinguish ##r## and ##\gamma##, ##w## and ##\omega##, ##v## and ##\nu## and ##\upsilon##?

They look very similar. Are there some rules that I should use one of them in some specific cases?

No they don't. Not when written like you did in Latex...
 
There's also
\rho and p, \chi and x, \kappa and k, \tau and T,
\gamma and Y , \eta and n, \beta and B, \epsilon and E,
and, finally, (iota) \iota and i and (omicron) \omicron and o and (upsilon) \upsilon and u or v.

If handwritten, the chance for confusion is higher.

What's sometimes annoying is having people call \rho "p", etc..

It's probably best to stick to common conventions.
I like to spell out the letter if I feel that confusion can arise.
e.g., the pressure p and the density (rho) \rho are related by p = p_0 +\rho g h
 
It's the Westerners' revenge for having to learn hundreds of characters when studying Chinese. :oldbiggrin:
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: Mono field, Haorong Wu, Wrichik Basu and 3 others
More seriously, I think there are two different things that you need to watch for, coming from a language such as Chinese:

1. In textbooks and in LaTeX, mathematical formulas use the Latin alphabet in a different font (typeface) than in ordinary print:

Math: ##a\, b\, c\, d\, e\, f\, g\, h\, i\, j\, k\, l\, m\, n\, o\, p\, q\, r\, s\, t\, u\, v\, w\, x\, y\, z##
Ordinary print: a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z

2. Mathematical formulas often use the Greek alphabet which is different from the Latin alphabet.

Greek math: ##\alpha\, \beta\, \gamma\, \delta\, \cdots##

You simply have to become familiar with the Greek alphabet and pay attention to characters which look similar to (but not identical with) Latin characters, e.g. ##\omega## "omega" versus ##w## "double-u" (in English; other languages have different names for it), or ##\rho## "rho" versus ##p## (p). My (American) students in introductory physics classes also often had trouble with these. Also with ##\kappa## "kappa" versus ##k## (k), and ##\alpha## "alpha" versus ##a## (a). It simply needs practice and memorization.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Mono field
Haorong Wu said:
How to distinguish ##r## and ##\gamma##, ##w## and ##\omega##, ##v## and ##\nu## and ##\upsilon##?

It is not possible except by knowing the convention and context. I had a lecturer who did not know or did not want to pronounce ##\xi## the conventional way, and called it "squiggle". It was fine as everyone understood the physics he intended to communicate.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: etotheipi and wukunlin
I had the misfortune to be the first English person two Greek students saw after they worked out that when us English people said "fie" we meant ##\phi##. It's apparently pronounced more like "fee", although with a shorter e sound. I have a feeling I could have learned quite a lot of bad language in Greek that day... It had been quite a problem for them because there was (to them) a mismatch between what was being said and what was being written.

I must say that if I'm using ##v## for velocity I'll typically use ##f## for frequency instead of ##\nu## to avoid confusion. And I hate working with the dust stress-energy tensor because it's ##\mathrm{diag}(\rho,p,p,p)## and I have to be very careful not to mix up density and pressure.

I suppose that all I'm really offering is sympathy. You do get used to knowing that people use rho for density, and then you're primed to look for the difference (the top left of a ##p## is different to a ##\rho##).
 
Do physicists or mathematicians actually use ##\upsilon## (lower-case Greek upsilon) for anything? I can't remember any examples. Of course, I'm familiar with ##\Upsilon## (upper-case upsilon) as the name of a particle.
 
I've seen it used as a variable index in really gnarly equations.
 
  • #10
robphy said:
There's also
\rho and p, \chi and x, \kappa and k, \tau and T,
\gamma and Y , \eta and n, \beta and B, \epsilon and E,
and, finally, (iota) \iota and i and (omicron) \omicron and o and (upsilon) \upsilon and u or v.

If handwritten, the chance for confusion is higher.

What's sometimes annoying is having people call \rho "p", etc..

It's probably best to stick to common conventions.
I like to spell out the letter if I feel that confusion can arise.
e.g., the pressure p and the density (rho) \rho are related by p = p_0 +\rho g h

I wonder whether there is a table listing convention usages.

After all, when I continue reading more and more textbooks, there are more and more symbols and quantities that I am not so familiar with as ##\rho## for density, ##p## for pressure, etc. It is difficult for me to clearly figure out which symbol I am encountered.
 
  • #11
Haorong Wu said:
I wonder whether there is a table listing convention usages.

After all, when I continue reading more and more textbooks, there are more and more symbols and quantities that I am not so familiar with as ##\rho## for density, ##p## for pressure, etc. It is difficult for me to clearly figure out which symbol I am encountered.
A decent textbook should at least define its symbols and conventions... and this varies among specializations.

Not necessarily definitive... but possibly useful : https://physics.info/symbols/
 

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K