How to Efficiently Triangulate a Concave Shape?

  • Thread starter Thread starter maze
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Concave Shape
maze
Messages
661
Reaction score
4
I am looking for a "good" way to triangulate a closed concave shape of vertices and edges.

"good" is quite a vague term, but the basic principles I'm interested in are:
1) Minimize "sliver" triangles that are very thin and contain really small angles.
2) Must be reasonable to compute. Ideally it would take less than a day to compute the triangulization for a mesh with ~10,000 vertices on a standard computer (so complete brute force is out).

Here is a diagram (initial shape in black):
http://img394.imageshack.us/img394/3077/concavetriangle.png

If the mesh was convex, a good strategy would be http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Delaunay_trianglulation method could work well if I had a fast way of finding the worst possible triangle among a subset of the shape, but I'm having no luck there.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Suggestion (it may not be very good): Form the convex hull of the polygon. Use Delaunay, being careful you don't cross any existing lines. Get rid of lines outside original polygon.
 
I think the Delaunay triangulization is unique
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top