How to express vector in sigma notation

AI Thread Summary
A vector A can be expressed in sigma notation as ∑ Ai, where i ranges from 1 to 3, representing the x, y, and z coordinates. To express vector A in polar form using sigma notation, basis vectors er, eθ, and eφ are used. Each of these basis vectors corresponds to a direction in polar coordinates, with r having a length dimension, while θ and φ are angles. The components of the vector in these directions are denoted as a, b, and c, which are independent of the polar coordinates. Understanding these components and their relationships is essential for proper vector representation in polar form.
reckon
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
A vector A, can be expressed in sigma notation as
\sum Ai where i runs from 1 to 3, i.e. A1 for x coordinate, A2 for y coordinate and A3 for z coordinate.

I wonder how to express vector A in polar form using sigma notation. Could anyone share their knowledge to me?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

Hi reckon ! Welcome to PF! :smile:

(have a sigma: ∑ :wink:)
reckon said:
A vector A, can be expressed in sigma notation as
\sum Ai where i runs from 1 to 3, i.e. A1 for x coordinate, A2 for y coordinate and A3 for z coordinate.

No, it's ∑ Aiei, where the {ei} are basis vectors.
I wonder how to express vector A in polar form using sigma notation. Could anyone share their knowledge to me?

You'd need to use the basis vectors er eθ and eφ.

But these are different at each point, and at the origin they aren't even defined.
 
Hahaha.. thanks tiny-tim for ∑ and you even provided with "for copying-pasting" in your signature.

But I'm still a bit unsure because for eθ eφ, we only have angle which doesn't have dimension, isn't it? Can we make them as component of a vector?

A=rer + θeθ + φeφ
where r have length dimension while θ and φ have no dimension?
 
Hi reckon! :smile:
reckon said:
But I'm still a bit unsure because for eθ eφ, we only have angle which doesn't have dimension, isn't it? Can we make them as component of a vector?

A=rer + θeθ + φeφ
where r have length dimension while θ and φ have no dimension?

ah … you obviously haven't come across these before …

no, er eθ and eφ are all unit vectors (with magnitude one), in the directions of increasing r, increasing θ, and increasing φ, respectively …

so they all have length dimension.

(it is traditional to use the symbol e for unit vectors)

A vector starting at the position (r,θ,φ) will be written as aer + beθ + ceφ, and a b and c have nothing to do with (r,θ,φ), they are simply the components of the vector in each of the three (perpendicular) directions. :smile:

(this would be easier to follow with a diagram, but unfortunately, I can't find a good one, in wikipedia or anywhere else :redface:)
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
19
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
1K
Replies
22
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
661
Replies
4
Views
2K
Back
Top