How to Find Δh for Gravitational Potential Energy Using Trigonometry?

AI Thread Summary
To find the change in height (Δh) for gravitational potential energy using trigonometry, one must determine the vertical difference between two spheres. The solution involves using basic trigonometric principles, specifically by drawing a right triangle from the sphere's position to a vertical line. The calculation provided shows that Δh equals 3.0 cm, derived from the formula 61 - (61 cos 18). Understanding the geometry of the situation is crucial, as it helps clarify the relationship between the triangle's sides. Mastery of these concepts is essential for solving similar physics problems effectively.
mutineer
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
In this question 3 bi
http://www.xtremepapers.com/CIE/International%20A%20And%20AS%20Level/9702%20-%20Physics/9702_w07_qp_2.pdf

to find gravitaional poteintial enrgy we need to find Δh. which is the vertical difference between the two spheres shown in the diagram. How do i find that?

Answer says (61 – {61 cos18} =) 3.0 cm, I can't figure out how?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


You'll have to learn basic trigonometry before you can solve the exercise.
 


torquil said:
You'll have to learn basic trigonometry before you can solve the exercise.

I have, but this ones kinda proving tough. Maybe the solution is staring at my face but i can't figure it out!
 


Hint: draw a horizontal line from the sphere position on the right (the dotted one), to the vertical solid line. Consider the right triangle that this creates.
 


jtbell said:
Hint: draw a horizontal line from the sphere position on the right (the dotted one), to the vertical solid line. Consider the right triangle that this creates.

OMG YES! I told you guys, it probably was staring right in my face. I was thinking more in the terms of forming and isosceles triangle in order to keep the lengths the same, but then again keeping them the same is the problem itself! Thanx a tonne!
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top