Electric Field Strength and Potential

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on determining the distance at which the electric field strength is maximum based on the potential gradient from Fig. 4.2. Participants assert that the maximum electric field strength occurs at 1.4 cm due to its highest value, while the marking scheme indicates 11.4 cm. The key point of contention is that the magnitude of the rate of change of potential, rather than its sign, is what defines the maximum electric field strength.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electric field strength and potential gradient
  • Familiarity with the concept of negative gradients in physics
  • Ability to interpret graphical data from figures such as Fig. 4.2
  • Knowledge of how to analyze the rate of change in physical quantities
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the relationship between electric field strength and potential gradients in electrostatics
  • Learn how to analyze and interpret potential vs. distance graphs
  • Research the significance of maximum and minimum values in calculus as applied to physics
  • Explore the implications of negative values in electric field strength and their physical interpretations
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in physics, particularly those studying electrostatics, as well as anyone interested in understanding the nuances of electric field strength and potential relationships.

elemis
Messages
162
Reaction score
1
Page 10 part (b) (ii) <click on the link

Now, the question states :

Use Fig. 4.2 to state and explain the distance x at which the rate of change of
potential with distance
is maximum

Now electric field strength = negative potential gradient

So in effect they're asking for the point at which electric field strength is maximum, correct ?

Now isn't maximum electric field strength at 1.4 cm because electric field strength has the greatest value at that point ?

The marking scheme provided disagrees and gives an answer of 11.4 cm...

But at 11.4 cm the electric field strength is highly negative...
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Rate of change can be positive or negative. It's the magnitude of the rate of change that counts, not it's sign.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K