How to Find E(1/(1 + e^Z)) for a Normally Distributed Z?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Hejdun
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inverse
Hejdun
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone,

I am stuck with this problem. I am looking for E(1/(1 + e^Z)) where Z is a normally distributed random variable.

I know that E(e^Z) and E(1/e^Z) follow lognormal and inverse lognormal distibution and the means of these distributions are standard results. Of course, is also easy to find E(e^Z + 1).

However regarding my problem, does anyone have a suggestion of how to proceed? I tried to use the moment generating function but got stuck...

Thanks in advance!
/Hejdun
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Sorry to bump this.

Still no ideas of how to solve this problem?

Of course, I can approximate it using Taylor expansion, but the
resulting expression isn't very nice.

/Hejdun
 
Maybe Gauss-Hermite quadrature will give you a decent approximation?
 
bpet said:
Maybe Gauss-Hermite quadrature will give you a decent approximation?

Yes, the integral may be evaluated numerically,
but I am looking for an analytical answer. I am not sure how the Gauss-Hermite quadrature would help for such a case.

Thanks.

/Hejdun
 
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Thread 'Detail of Diagonalization Lemma'
The following is more or less taken from page 6 of C. Smorynski's "Self-Reference and Modal Logic". (Springer, 1985) (I couldn't get raised brackets to indicate codification (Gödel numbering), so I use a box. The overline is assigning a name. The detail I would like clarification on is in the second step in the last line, where we have an m-overlined, and we substitute the expression for m. Are we saying that the name of a coded term is the same as the coded term? Thanks in advance.

Similar threads

Back
Top