How to find equation for a position vector function on a parabaloid?

Click For Summary
To find the position vector function on a paraboloid defined by z=x²+y², the integral of the given velocity vector r'(t)=<cos(t), -sin(t), -2sin(t)> is necessary, resulting in a general form with constants C_1, C_2, and C_3. The challenge lies in determining these constants to satisfy the surface equation. Attempting to substitute the components into the paraboloid equation may not yield correct results, as having a specific velocity does not guarantee the object lies on the surface. It is essential to explore various constant values to see if the conditions can be met. Ultimately, the relationship between velocity and surface constraints must be carefully analyzed.
Thadis
Messages
43
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Velocity vector given by r'(t)=<cos(t), -sin(t), -2sin(t)>
Surface that the position vector needs to lie on: z=x2+y2


Homework Equations


Integral of r'(t) will give position function


The Attempt at a Solution



I know that the integral of r'(t) will give me the position function down to a constant so I know the vector is something like <sin(t)+C_1, cos(t)+C_2, 2cos(t)+C_3> I just do not know how to figure out the different C's for the components. I have tried putting the components into the surfaces equation but it didnt turn out correct. Anyone have any advice of how to solve this problem.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Thadis said:

Homework Statement


Velocity vector given by r'(t)=<cos(t), -sin(t), -2sin(t)>
Surface that the position vector needs to lie on: z=x2+y2


Homework Equations


Integral of r'(t) will give position function


The Attempt at a Solution



I know that the integral of r'(t) will give me the position function down to a constant so I know the vector is something like <sin(t)+C_1, cos(t)+C_2, 2cos(t)+C_3> I just do not know how to figure out the different C's for the components. I have tried putting the components into the surfaces equation but it didnt turn out correct. Anyone have any advice of how to solve this problem.
]

Try plugging the components of that vector into the equation ##z=x^2+y^2## and see if you can pick values of your three constants to make it work.
 
The real difficulty is that the statement in the problem isn't true. Two object "miles" apart can have exactly the same velocity vector. An object having that velocity is not automatically costrained to lie on that surface. Doing what LCKurtz suggest would show that it is possible for an object having that velocity to stay on that surface. It would not show that it "needs to lie" on it.
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K