How to find equipotential surface for given case?

AI Thread Summary
Equipotential surfaces created by a uniform grid of long, equally spaced parallel charged wires exhibit periodic changes in shape due to the alternating presence of charges. At greater distances, the grid resembles a uniformly charged plane, leading to a consistent potential across the surface. The periodic variation occurs because the charge distribution alternates between charged wires and gaps, affecting the potential landscape. This results in equipotential surfaces that are not uniform close to the grid but become parallel to the plane as distance increases. Understanding this behavior is crucial for analyzing electric fields in similar configurations.
Dexter Neutron
Messages
50
Reaction score
0
Q:- Describe equipotential surface due to a uniform grid consisting of long equally spaced parallel charged wires in a plane.
The answer given in my textbook is - Equipotential surface have shape which changes periodically. At far off distances it becomes parallel to the plane.

Why the equipotential surface changes periodically here?Please Explain.
Any help would be appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I can answer the second question. At far off distances the grid should look like a uniformly charged plane. This results in the potential being equivalent to that of a uniformly charged plane.
 
Dexter Neutron said:
Why the equipotential surface changes periodically here?

Because the charge distribution changes periodical (wire - no wire - wire - no wire - ...).
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Let there be a person in a not yet optimally designed sled at h meters in height. Let this sled free fall but user can steer by tilting their body weight in the sled or by optimal sled shape design point it in some horizontal direction where it is wanted to go - in any horizontal direction but once picked fixed. How to calculate horizontal distance d achievable as function of height h. Thus what is f(h) = d. Put another way, imagine a helicopter rises to a height h, but then shuts off all...
Back
Top