How to get into analytics field with 'entry level' background

  • Thread starter Thread starter semidevil
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Entry level Field
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on transitioning from a product analyst role in insurance to the analytics or data science fields. The individual has six months of SQL experience and is considering whether to pursue actuarial exams or focus on learning R and SAS for analytics roles. Key insights include the importance of understanding the distinction between analytics and data science, the need for substantial learning regardless of the chosen path, and the potential for roles in business analytics that require less formal education but offer competitive salaries. The conversation emphasizes the necessity of making informed career choices based on long-term interests rather than short-term challenges.

PREREQUISITES
  • Basic knowledge of SQL for data manipulation and reporting
  • Familiarity with Excel for data analysis and visualization
  • Understanding of statistical learning methods relevant to data science
  • Awareness of the actuarial exam process and its demands
NEXT STEPS
  • Learn R through "Introduction to Statistical Learning" for foundational knowledge
  • Explore Python for machine learning applications via relevant literature
  • Participate in Kaggle competitions to gain practical data science experience
  • Research advanced business consultant roles that leverage SQL, SAS, and Excel skills
USEFUL FOR

Individuals in product analysis, aspiring data scientists, and those considering a career shift into analytics or actuarial roles will benefit from this discussion.

semidevil
Messages
156
Reaction score
2
I am currently in the insurance field as a 'product analyst.' My main duties include using SQL to run reports, update reports, create ad hoc reports, and connecting said reports to excel for 'data analysis'(pivot tables etc). My tenure in SQL is around 6 months but I've been in insurance in a non technical field for 8 years. My first thought is of course the actuarial field. I passed the first exam last year, but I've been struggling with blocking out time to study for the second exam. My issue is that i sometimes work long hours for my product role, and it's really hard to focus on one role while studying for exams to plan for a potential future role. Plus, I'm still new in SQL so sometimes I question if I should just develop extra time towards my current role before I try to jump ship that hasn't even arrived yet (make sense?). Oh and I have a child arriving in a couple months.

So with that in mind, I start to question what I want to do. I KNOW that I want to develop in the analytics area. Modeling, forecasting, 'building' stuff. The actuarial path is a way to get there hence the reason I chose actuarial route.

Suppose I give up on actuarial and want to look for analytics/data science jobs, is it still possible? Even the entry level or 'JR' jobs I see requires ph.D or lots of experience. My experience is 6 months of SQL and excel, and a bachelors in math 10 years ago. I do not see myself going back to school. Is it worth my effort to buy a couple of books on R or SAS and get beginner level experience? Will that help me at all in getting a job?

The reason I'm thinking of utilizing my time to study R and SAS over actuarial is that I feel the actuarial does drain too much energy out of me where the software I can choose to study more 'casually'. (I.e no need to do math problems every day, no pressure of exams, etc)

The reason I'm looking for a new job is because the company itself is disorganized, bad benefits, and the 'data' analysis work is very limited. It's not a place that I can grow and develop my skills.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Let me first say that the way you're using the term "analytics" differs from how I typically see it used. The way I usually see "analytics" used it has a very broad meaning, and in fact what you're doing now sounds like what a lot of people I know do who actually have the title "analyst".

Ont he other hand, data science is, while still poorly defined, certainly more defined than "analytics". Data science is distinguished primarily by statistical learning methods. I would suggest either Elements of Statistical Learning or Introduction to Statistical Learning. The latter will probably be fine for a first run, and will help you learn R. There are books out there that walk you through machine learning using python that would be good as well.

However, I think you need to be sure you're making your choice for the right reason. Your post suggests you're considering data science because the actuarial exams are too much of a committment. In the long term, actuarial exams probably require more effort (though not necessarily more intelligence or creativity). However in the short run, if you want to make a move into machine learning, data science, or other big data roles, you'll need to study just as hard as you would for an actuarial exam. It will not be a quick switch, as you have a long way to go.

So if you're choosing between the actuarial path and other big data roles, please do it because of what the work is like on the other side, and not the (relatively) short term costs in between.

If you do decide to go the actuarial route, begin apply to jobs now. While your exam progress is not as far along as other entry level candidates, you already have skills that are needed that those other candidates don't have. If you manage to land a student role, you'll have study time at work.

If you go the data science route, the first step is to do a whole lot of learning. Follow Kaggle competitions, become fluent in R and Python, and get some experience playing with Hadoop or other big data pipelines. Then you can begin applying for entry level roles that may fit what you're looking for.

A third option I'd like to put on the table is to push towards advanced business consultant roles. These would require less outside of work learning than the other two options, but they'll require more muscle. Essentially, I know lots of people who do a great deal of business analytics and are paid reasonably well for their work ($75k - $90k range). They aren't using very advanced statistical methods, and they aren't actuaries. The trick is that there's not a good path to these jobs - you'll just have to keep moving up, keep demonstrating your SQL/SAS/Excel/Access skills and keep changing jobs until you're in the role you want.

Goodluck!
 

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
8K