1. Limited time only! Sign up for a free 30min personal tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Homework Help: How to get to this KVL expression

  1. Feb 10, 2010 #1
    in this photo there is the circuit and the KVL of the solution
    5aov46.jpg

    but when i tried to do the KVL
    i go from the arc(3 lines represents potential zero)
    in counter clockwise direction
    so i get[tex] V_L + V_C+V_R-V_s=0[/tex]
    when i go against the direction of a current the voltage is on PLUS
    when in the voltage source i go from + to - we have -V_s

    so where is my mistake
    i cant figure out how to get to the expression they got from my expression
    ?
     
    Last edited: Feb 11, 2010
  2. jcsd
  3. Feb 10, 2010 #2
    Are you saying that the KVL equation you have drawn in that picture is the solution you should arrive to? The equation looks incorrect as the last term is in units of current, not voltage. The summation of voltages should never equal units of current.

    The solution aside I would recommend you look at what you are defining as VL, and VC. These values are just assigned to particular nodes in the circuit. They don't describe the voltage drop across elements.

    See this circuit below for the difference. It's not the node voltage at the "+" end of the capacitor that's important, it's the voltage at the "+" end of the capacitor relative to the "-" end of the capacitor. Same applies for the inductor and the resistor.

    http://img6.imageshack.us/img6/7553/0210001730.jpg" [Broken]
     
    Last edited by a moderator: May 4, 2017
  4. Feb 11, 2010 #3
    yes you are correct its current not a voltage


    does my logic in finding the KVL correct?
     
    Last edited: Feb 11, 2010
  5. Feb 11, 2010 #4
    Sorry for any confusion, I was referring to the KVL equation in the image you posted. The equation reads:

    [tex]V_S=V_L+V+\frac{V_S-V_C}{R}[/tex]​

    V/R gives a current, that's all I was saying.
     
  6. Feb 11, 2010 #5
    No the logic you have used in finding the equation, [tex]V_L+V_C+V_R-V_S=0[/tex] is incorrect.


    The voltage V_c does not represent the voltage drop across the resistor that is needed for the KVL loop. It is the voltage at that node relative to ground. So it is the voltage across the resistor plus the voltage supplied by the voltage source.

    Take a look at the image I linked to earlier. The voltages in that image are the voltages across each circuit element rather then the voltage at a particular node relative to ground. Do a KVL loop of that circuit and substitute the values of each voltage with the corresponding equation I listed with the image. Your KVL equation should give you a second order differential equation in terms of I_L and I_c. Use the KCL equation you showed in your image in the OP and you can get the differential equation in terms of either I_L or I_c with respect to V_S and I_S.
     
  7. Feb 11, 2010 #6
    "V_c does not represent the voltage drop across the resistor"

    V_c represents the drop accros the capacitor

    V_r represent the voltage drop across the resistor
     
  8. Feb 11, 2010 #7
    In your drawing the node V_c is labeled as a the voltage level at a particular node. With the location of the ground in your circuit one would assume that unreferenced node voltages are referenced to ground. This would make V_c the voltage drop across the resistor and the voltage source, not the capacitor even though that's what you really want V_c to be. Look how the circuit I drew is different.
     
  9. Feb 11, 2010 #8
    "V_c is the voltage across the resistor plus the voltage supplied by the voltage source"
    i agree.
    so what is the correct KVL?
     
  10. Feb 11, 2010 #9
    what is the correct KVL equation you think?
     
  11. Feb 13, 2010 #10
    anyone??
    i cant understand what is the right kvl
    ?
     
Share this great discussion with others via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook