How to handle the Dirac delta function as a boundary condition

mathy_girl
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
Using perturbation theory, I'm trying to solve the following problem

\frac{\partial P}{\partial \tau} = \frac{1}{2}\varepsilon^2 \alpha^2 \frac{\partial^2 P}{\partial f^2} + \rho \varepsilon^2 \nu \alpha^2 \frac{\partial^2 P}{\partial f \partial \alpha} + \frac{1}{2}\varepsilon^2 \nu^2 \alpha^2 \frac{\partial^2 P}{\partial \alpha^2}, \quad \mbox{for } \tau&gt;0,<br />
with initial condition P = \alpha^2~\delta(f-K), \quad \mbox{for } \tau=0.

Expanding P_\varepsilon=P_0 + \varepsilon^2 P_1 + \ldots the \mathcal{O}(1) equation is given by
\frac{\partial P_0}{\partial \tau} = 0, \quad \mbox{for } \tau&gt;0,
with boundary condition P_0 = \alpha^2~\delta(f-K) \mbox{ for } \tau=0.

Obviously, this gives P_0 = \alpha^2~\delta(f-K).

Now I would like to solve the \mathcal{O}(\varepsilon^2) problem
\frac{\partial P_1}{\partial \tau} = \frac{1}{2} \alpha^2 \frac{\partial^2 P_0}{\partial f^2} + \rho \nu \alpha^2 \frac{\partial^2 P_0}{\partial f \partial \alpha} + \frac{1}{2} \nu^2 \alpha^2 \frac{\partial^2 P_0}{\partial \alpha^2}, \quad \mbox{for } \tau&gt;0
with initial condition P_1 = 0 \mbox{ for } \tau=0.

Does anyone of you know how to handle the Dirac Delta function in the initial condition and O(1) solution here?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
There shouldn't be any epsilon in the equations.
 
It is kind of 2D diffusion (or heat conduction) equation with an initial condition, not boundary.

Physically the exact solution should describe the "relaxation" of initial non uniformity of P.

I am afraid it cannot be solved by the perturbation theory in powers of epsilon - you neglect the derivative terms that are responsible for the space relaxation.

Consider a simpler 2D equation - with constant coefficients and analyse the exact solution, if it is expandable (analytical in epsilon at epsilon=0).
 
AiRAVATA said:
There shouldn't be any epsilon in the equations.

Sorry, that's my mistake.. think it's a copy-paste error. I corrected it in the previous message.
 
Have you tried a numerical approach?
 
CFDFEAGURU said:
Have you tried a numerical approach?

That's always possible, but the assignment here is to do it analytically... Tomorrow I'll ask my supervisor if he thinks there's another way to solve this analytically.
 
Are there any good visualization tutorials, written or video, that show graphically how separation of variables works? I particularly have the time-independent Schrodinger Equation in mind. There are hundreds of demonstrations out there which essentially distill to copies of one another. However I am trying to visualize in my mind how this process looks graphically - for example plotting t on one axis and x on the other for f(x,t). I have seen other good visual representations of...
Back
Top