How to incorporate the neutral current into the Dirac equation

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on incorporating the neutral current interaction into the Dirac equation for numerical simulations. The neutral current interaction is represented by the vertex -iψγμ(gV - gAγ5)ψ Zμ, where gV and gA are the vector and axial vector couplings, respectively. Key components such as the Z spinor and the integration process with the Dirac equation are explored. The conversation highlights the need for accessible resources on particle physics to clarify the integration of these terms.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Dirac equation and its applications in quantum mechanics.
  • Familiarity with the Electroweak Lagrangian and its components.
  • Knowledge of gamma matrices and their role in quantum field theory.
  • Basic concepts of weak isospin and the weak mixing angle (θW).
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the integration of the neutral current interaction into the Dirac equation.
  • Study the properties and components of the Z boson spinor in particle physics.
  • Examine papers on numerical methods for simulating particle interactions, particularly involving neutrinos.
  • Explore the concept of potential fields in quantum mechanics and their application to particle interactions.
USEFUL FOR

Graduate students in physics, researchers in particle physics, and anyone interested in advanced quantum mechanics and numerical simulations of particle interactions.

BobbyV
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi Everyone,

I'm a math grad student working on numerical procedures for the Dirac equation, and I'd like to be able to incorporate the neutral current interaction

neutrino + fermion -> Z bozon -> neutrino + fermion <- poorly impersonated Feynman diagram

into the Dirac equation as a potential term to allow me to calculate more physically meaningful results. The problem is, I'm familiar enough with the notation to expand the neutral current interaction into full matrix form so I can start programming it into the computer.

Here's the neutral current equation from Wikipedia's entry on Neutral Current
ba12c2f02bcbdc573f538b5e394e42c1.png


and here's the neutral current component of the Electroweak Lagrangian
f23248acf1bb75e432e75a2ddf762b03.png


Which of these is most appropriate to integrate into the Dirac equation, and how so?

How can I find the formal definition of each of the terms so I can expand them? (the gamma matrices are pretty straightforward, of course, but I have trouble with other terms like the matrix definition of weak isospin and the vector and axial vector couplings)

Any help would be appreciated, including links to papers on this topic.

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
BobbyV, The vertex that couples to the Z is -iψγμ(gV - gAγ5)ψ Zμ. The relationship you need to use is gV - gAγ5 ≡ (g/cos θW) (cV - cAγ5) = (g/cos θW) (½(1 - γ5)T3 - sin2θWQ) where g is the weak coupling constant, T3 is the third component of isospin, Q is the charge, and θW is the weak mixing angle: MW/MZ = cos θW.
 
Hi Bill_K! Thank you for your prompt reply. Because I'm unfamiliar with particle physics, I have a couple of questions for you from your equation:

-iψγμ(gV - gAγ5)ψ Zμ

1. How does one find the components of the Z spinor, Zμ above? I'm told this should be available, but I haven't been able to find an accessible paper on this.

2. Is the wave function on the left ψ the wave function conjugate, or is the wave function for the second particle involved in the scattering?

3. If the answer to 2. is that it's the conjugate, how do we take the second particle into account in this interaction? I'm assuming that we may multiply the second particle's wavefunction on the right and it's conjugate on the left, but I could easily be mistaken.

4. How does one finally integrate this with the Dirac equation? My guess would be to do something like what I'm talking about in question 3, but simply remove the two conjugate wave functions from the left side of the equation to get something like this:

γμ(gV - gAγ5)ψ Zμ + (-iγμμ + m)ψ = 0

5. Instead of considering two particles, could we impersonate the entire neutral current with potential field? I remember from the example of the hydrogen atom, the proton is represented as a coulomb potential instead of a particle, and was wondering if something similar could be done here? I'm trying to model neutrino - matter interactions, so the momentum of the neutrinos (pretty high) might make this approach invalid...

I'm really sorry if this is too many questions. I really appreciate the opportunity to ask questions with someone who knows about physics :)

Thanks!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 49 ·
2
Replies
49
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 50 ·
2
Replies
50
Views
4K