How to integrate the following equation

  • Thread starter Thread starter aerogurl2
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integrate
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
3 replies · 2K views
aerogurl2
Messages
34
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Hi, i don't really know how I should go about this question. please help me.

Question:
Integrate the following equation:
I = (integration sign from 0 to 2 sqrt3) (x^3)/(16-x^2)^(1/2)

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I tried to assign u and dv initially like this:

u = (16-x^2)^(1/2)
du = -(16-x^2)^(-1/2) dx

dv = x^3 dx
v = (1/4)(x^4)

so uv - (INT)vdu
= (1/4)(16-x^2)(x^4) + (1/4)(INT)(x^4)/(16-x^4)^(1/2) dx

but it gets more complicated because of x^4, if x^3 in the integration then i could have assigned it as I and then solve it easily, but i think i made a huge mistake somewhere to get it to be like this.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
With experience, you'll realize that a trigonometric substitution in the denominator works best in cases like these. A big clue is the sqrt(3) in the bounds, this is immediately reminiscent of special angle ratios like sin(pi/3), right?

Anyway, your first objective here is to get rid of the denominator by applying a trig sub. Try [tex]x = 4\sin{\theta}[/tex]. Simplify.

You'll be left with a cubed trig expression to integrate. Do that by parts ([tex]\sin^3{\theta} = \sin^2{\theta}\sin{\theta}[/tex]). It's not difficult, in fact, it can neatly be done in two lines with a little application of some trig identities and a little algebra.

Finally, don't sub x back into the final indefinite integral. Leave everything in terms of theta. Work out the values of theta that correspond to the bounds of the definite integral and evaluate. Much neater.
 
Last edited:
When you see a squareroot, trig substitution can look very tempting, but another method can shorten the work greatly.

For example...

[tex] \begin{array}{l}<br /> \int {\frac{{x^3 }}{{\sqrt {16 - x^2 } }}} dx \\ <br /> {\rm{let}}{\kern 1pt} {\kern 1pt} {\kern 1pt} u = \sqrt {16 - x^2 } {\kern 1pt} {\kern 1pt} {\kern 1pt} \to x^2 = 16 - u^2 \\ <br /> du = \frac{{ - x}}{{\sqrt {16 - x^2 } }}dx \\ <br /> \int {\frac{{x^3 }}{{\sqrt {16 - x^2 } }}} dx = \int {\left( {u^2 - 16 } \right)} du \\ <br /> \end{array}<br /> [/tex]
 
Last edited:
ChaoticLlama said:
When you see a squareroot, trig substitution can look very tempting, but another method can shorten the work greatly.

For example...

[tex] \begin{array}{l}<br /> \int {\frac{{x^3 }}{{\sqrt {16 - x^2 } }}} dx \\ <br /> {\rm{let}}{\kern 1pt} {\kern 1pt} {\kern 1pt} u = \sqrt {16 - x^2 } {\kern 1pt} {\kern 1pt} {\kern 1pt} \to x^2 = 16 - u^2 \\ <br /> du = \frac{{ - x}}{{\sqrt {16 - x^2 } }}dx \\ <br /> \int {\frac{{x^3 }}{{\sqrt {16 - x^2 } }}} dx = \int {\left( {u^2 - 16 } \right)} du \\ <br /> \end{array}<br /> [/tex]

Yes, that's a much neater method! :smile: