I How to introduce dissipation to a spinning top

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on modifying the Lagrangian of an axisymmetric spinning top to account for dissipation at the pivot point. It emphasizes that the Lagrangian cannot be altered directly for dissipative systems, as they do not conform to Hamiltonian mechanics. Instead, general equations are suggested to describe the system's dynamics, incorporating a dissipation torque. The relationship between the generalized forces and the velocities is highlighted, indicating that dissipation results in non-positive work. Overall, the conversation centers on the complexities of incorporating dissipation into the Lagrangian framework.
etotheipi
A axisymmetric spinning top is pivoted at O. The components of the inertia tensor ##I_O## at the point ##O##, with respect to the principal axes, are denoted ##A##, ##A## and ##C##. It's Lagrangian is$$\mathcal{L}(\mathbf{q}, \dot{\mathbf{q}}) = \frac{1}{2} A\dot{\theta}^2 + \frac{1}{2}A(\dot{\phi} \sin{\theta})^2 + \frac{1}{2}C(\dot{\psi} + \dot{\phi} \cos{\theta})^2 - mgh\cos{\theta}$$How can the Lagrangian be modified to account for dissipation at the pivot? We can't use the Rayleigh function here, because that is for velocity-dependent dissipation. Are there some references?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
etotheipi said:
How can the Lagrangian be modified to account for dissipation at the pivot?
You can not modify the Lagrangian in such a way because the system with dissipation is not a Hamiltonian system. Use general equations:
$$\frac{d}{dt}\frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot x^i}-\frac{\partial L}{\partial x^i}=Q_i(t,x,\dot x)$$
Dissipation means that ##Q_i\dot x^i\le 0##

If say you apply a dissipation torque ##\boldsymbol \tau## then
$$Q_i=\Big(\boldsymbol\tau,\frac{\partial\boldsymbol\omega}{\partial\dot x^i}\Big)$$
 
Last edited:
  • Informative
  • Like
Likes vanhees71 and etotheipi
Thread 'Why higher speeds need more power if backward force is the same?'
Power = Force v Speed Power of my horse = 104kgx9.81m/s^2 x 0.732m/s = 1HP =746W Force/tension in rope stay the same if horse run at 0.73m/s or at 15m/s, so why then horse need to be more powerfull to pull at higher speed even if backward force at him(rope tension) stay the same? I understand that if I increase weight, it is hrader for horse to pull at higher speed because now is backward force increased, but don't understand why is harder to pull at higher speed if weight(backward force)...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
453
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
509
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
345
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
561
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
3K
Replies
29
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K