How to invert an integral equation

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
3 replies · 7K views
nista
Messages
11
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Suppose we have a physical quantity [tex]f(r)[/tex] depending on another quantity [tex]q(r).[/tex] [tex]f(r)[/tex] is known at all points.
If the following relationship holds:

Homework Equations


[tex]f(r)=\int_{\Omega}q(r-r')dr'[/tex]
where [tex]\Omega[/tex] is a bounded volume,
is there any possibility to invert somehow such relationship
in order to have informations on [tex]q(r)[/tex]?
Something like (but not necessarily):
[tex]q(r)=Lf(r)[/tex]
where [tex]L[/tex] is a linear operator.

The Attempt at a Solution


It is a problem similar to that of the Poisson equation, but I should procede
in the opposite way, starting from the integral relationship to get the differential form.
I have already tried to do that but with no success.
This is a textbook like example but I have to say I have no idea whether a solution exists.
(I have not taken it from a book)
Thank you very much to all
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
not an answer but maybe an insight, not totally sure on the generalistion to multiple dimensions, as I have only really played with convolutions in 1D...

here's some stuff on convolutions if you haven't seen them
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Convolution

define an indicator function for [itex]\Omega[/itex]:
[tex]s(r) = 1, \ r \ in \ \Omega, \ 0 \ otherwise[/tex]

Now using the indicator function, you can change the integral to a convolution over all space
[tex]f(r)=s*q = \int s(r') q(r-r')dr'[/tex]

Using the properties of convolution q*s = s*q
[tex]f(r)=q*s = \int q(r') s(r-r')dr'[/tex]

so the integral is summing up q(r) over the volume Omega, shifted to center r
 
then, the convolution theorem says, if you take the Fourier transform a convolution, then:
[tex]F=\mathbb{F} \{ f(r) \} = \mathbb{F} \{ q*s (r) \} =\mathbb{F} \{ q(r) \} \mathbb{F} \{ s(r) \} = QS[/tex]

then rearranging for q
[tex]q(r) = \mathbb{F}^{-1} \{ \frac{F}{S} \}[/tex]
 
I do not see anything I could complain about this derivation.
I guessed you solved the problem.
What else to say ...
Many thanks lanedance!
Hope you have a nice day,
Cheers