How to mathematically express sum of products

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter szg07
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sum
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on mathematically expressing the sum of products, particularly in the context of resistors in parallel. The formula for three resistors is given as (R1*R2*R3) / (R1*R2 + R1*R3 + R2*R3), and for n resistors, it involves the product of all resistors divided by the sum of all combinations of (n-1) resistors. The introduction of a parallel operator (||) simplifies notation, allowing expressions like R1 || R2 || R3. Additionally, for general cases, an index function is suggested to represent combinations, using sigma (Σ) and pi (Π) notation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of resistor networks and parallel circuits
  • Familiarity with mathematical notation, including sigma (Σ) and pi (Π)
  • Basic knowledge of combinatorial mathematics
  • Experience with polynomial expressions and their products
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the mathematical properties of the parallel operator (||) in circuit theory
  • Learn about combinatorial notation and how to define index functions for combinations
  • Explore the application of determinants in expressing sums of products
  • Study the use of Greek letters in mathematical notation for permutations and combinations
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, electrical engineers, and students studying circuit theory or combinatorial mathematics will benefit from this discussion.

szg07
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi everybody,

I have been solving some problems in physics and mathematics that often involve expressions where you need to represent the sum of products,

a simple example would be :

resistors in parallel

when 3 resistors are in parallel, you always get an expression like :

(R1*R2*R3)/ (R1*R2 + R1*R3 + R2*R3)

and when you have an n resistors in parallel, that would give :

(R1*R2*R3*...*Rn) / (the sum of all combinations of (n-1) resistors out of n resistors)

my problem is that I would like to be able to represent such results with a general formula
using the SIGMA sign or PI sign whatever the number of resistors involved

and even with matrices (determinant)

How would I do that?

Hope you can help me!

Thanks a lot
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Welcome to Physics Forums.

In your resistor example, one could write:

[tex]\sum_{\begin{array}{c}j,k=1\\ j\neq k\end{array}}^N\prod_{i=1}^{N}\frac{R_i}{R_j\cdot R_k} = \frac{R_1\cdot R_2 \cdot \ldots \cdot R_{N-1}\cdot R_N}{R_1\cdot R_2 + \ldots + R_{N-1}\cdot R_N}[/tex]
 
For resistors specifically, engineers often introduce a new operator || ("parallel") as a shorthand, defined by

A || B = AB/(A + B)

Therefore, for several resistors, one might write

R1 || R2 || R3 || ... || Rn

This operator is commutative and associative, so no need to write parentheses.

But of course, it won't make sense outside the context of circuits (and with resistors specifically, or possibly complex impedances).

Also, Hootenanny's formula is incorrect. What you want is

[tex]R_1 || R_2 || ... || R_N = \frac{\prod_{i=1}^N R_i}{\sum_{j=1}^N \left( \frac{1}{R_j} \prod_{k=1}^N R_k \right) }[/tex]

For the more general case (for example, in polynomials, where you might want all the products of k objects out of n), then you need to define some "index function" that selects each combination of k indices out of n. I don't know of an official way to notate this, so you can make something up. Greek letters are good: pi is used in this sense to denote permutations, and sigma is used to denote the parity of a permutation. So maybe kappa would be good for combinations? Then you could write

[tex]\sum_{\kappa(k, n)} \prod_{i \in \kappa} a_i[/tex]

This is a bit abstract, but the point is that the reader can tell what you mean.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K