I How to measure average thermal conductivity of a metallic material?

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter zenterix
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Thermodynamics
AI Thread Summary
Heat conduction is the transfer of energy between adjacent material elements due to temperature differences, described by the fundamental law of heat conduction. Experiments demonstrate that the heat flow through a slab is proportional to the area and the temperature gradient, leading to the equation for thermal conductivity, K. To measure thermal conductivity in metals, a bar is heated at one end while the other end is cooled, with heat loss calculated by measuring the temperature change in water. Accurate measurements require thermocouples placed at a distance apart to avoid erroneous readings and ensure steady-state conditions are achieved before recording data. Understanding these principles is crucial for accurate thermal conductivity assessments.
zenterix
Messages
774
Reaction score
84
TL;DR Summary
How exactly does this experiment to measure average thermal conductivity of a metallic slab work?
Heat conduction is the transport of energy between neighboring volume elements in a material as a result of the temperature difference between them.

The "fundamental law of heat conduction", as it is called in the book I am reading, is a "generalization of the results of experiments on the linear flow of heat through a slab perpendicular to the faces".

Pictorially, such experiments do the following

1699738959320.png

The blue rectangular box represents a slab of a material of thickness ##\Delta x## and the area of the side faces is ##A##. One face is maintained at temperature ##T## and the other at ##T+\Delta T##.

The heat that flows perpendicular to the faces for a time ##t## is measured.

The same experiment is repeated by keeping the material the same and varying ##\Delta x## and ##A##.

These experiments lead to the following result

$$\frac{Q}{t} \propto A\frac{\Delta T}{\Delta x}\tag{1}$$

which is approximately true for finite ##\Delta T## and ##\Delta x## and rigorously true when these are infinitesimals.

In this limit, we obtain

$$\frac{dQ}{dt}=-KA\frac{dT}{dx}\tag{2}$$

where the ##dQ## is an inexact differential (I don't know how to write the correct symbol in latex).

The derivative ##dT/dx## is the temperature gradient, ##K## is the thermal conductivity.

My question is about measurement of thermal conductivity.

Here is the experiment for a metal.

The metal is made into the form of a bar, one end is heated electrically, the other end is cooled with a stream of water. The surface of the bar is thermally insulated.

Heat loss through the insulation is calculated by subtracting the rate at which heat enters the water from the rate at which electrical energy is supplied.

The equation used to determine the average thermal conductivity within the given temperature range is

$$K=\frac{L}{A(T_1-T_2)}\frac{dQ}{dt}\tag{3}$$

where again, ##dQ## is an inexact differential.

The temperature difference is measured with thermocouples at two places a distance ##L## apart.

Here is what I think happens

- The amount of heat provided during a certain time to one end of the metal is known (how does one control the amount of heat?). This is ##dQ/dt##.

- ##L## and ##A## are fixed

- The only thing measured is the "temperature difference". This temperature difference seems to be that between the two metallic faces.

However, it also seems that one somehow measures heat entering the water as well. How does one do this?

Does it involve also measuring the temperature difference of the water?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
zenterix said:
The only thing measured is the "temperature difference". This temperature difference seems to be that between the two metallic faces.
No. The temperature difference is the difference between the readings of the thermocouples that are placed distance ##L## apart. I wouldn't place the thermocouples at the ends of the block where the heat source and sink are because you are likely to get erroneous readings.
zenterix said:
Does it involve also measuring the temperature difference of the water?
Yes, you need to do some calorimetry to find out how much heat enters the water per unit time. The equation for ##K## assumes that no heat is lost as it travels from one end to the other.

Also, you should not record any measurements until you are sure that the steady state is reached. How are you going to figure out when this happens?
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Hello! Let's say I have a cavity resonant at 10 GHz with a Q factor of 1000. Given the Lorentzian shape of the cavity, I can also drive the cavity at, say 100 MHz. Of course the response will be very very weak, but non-zero given that the Loretzian shape never really reaches zero. I am trying to understand how are the magnetic and electric field distributions of the field at 100 MHz relative to the ones at 10 GHz? In particular, if inside the cavity I have some structure, such as 2 plates...
Back
Top