How to mentaly get answers at once when given in powers?

  • Thread starter Thread starter dilan
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Mental calculation of powers, such as 6^12, can be challenging without memorization or advanced techniques. Proficiency in multiplying large numbers mentally is crucial for quick calculations. Memorizing specific powers can aid in simplifying the process, allowing for shortcuts in calculations. A recommended resource for improving mental calculation skills is the book "Dead Reckoning: Calculating Without Instruments." Developing a balance between memorization and calculation methods can enhance mental math abilities.
dilan
Messages
72
Reaction score
0
Is there any method that you can calculate by mentaly and get answers mentaly when a number is given with a power.
I mean for example say, 3^4 will be equal to 81. This is just a simple one. I mean now if a number is given like 6^12 then is there a method that you can get the answer by mental caculation ?:confused:

Thank you.:smile:
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
This seems to more of a problem in brain function than math. Essentially, how adept are you at multiplying large numbers mentally (I am assuming that you have not memorized a table of logs)? For your example, 6^2=36, 36^2=pa, pa^3=pb. If you can do it, more power to you!
 
You can sort of cut corners in the process if you memorize powers of numbers. E.g. 63=216. 64=1296. 65=7776. 66=46656. If you want to do mental calculations of this sort, you can make some sort of tradeoff between what you memorize and what you calculate. I have some of those memorized because I've calculated them several times :P

About 13 years ago a book was written, Dead Reckoning: Calculating Without Instruments, by Ronald W. Doerfler and Ronald E. Doerfler. If you are interested in doing this sort of thing, and more, I'd suggest you take a look at it. Here's the link to it on Amazon.
 
Last edited:
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top