How to Prove Divisibility in Math Problems?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Nx2
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Proofs
AI Thread Summary
To prove that if n is an odd positive integer, then either n+5 or n+7 is divisible by 4, it is established that n can be expressed as 2k+1. The calculations show that n+5 equals 2(k+3) and n+7 equals 2(k+4), indicating both results are even. Since k+3 and k+4 are consecutive integers, one of them must be even, confirming that one of the two expressions is divisible by 2. Therefore, one of n+5 or n+7 is indeed divisible by 4, validating the original statement. The discussion highlights the importance of recognizing properties of consecutive integers in proofs.
Nx2
Messages
40
Reaction score
0
i just started my second semester with geomtry and am having difficulties with these proofs. i am stuck on this one question which asks:

prove that if n is an odd positive integer, then one of the numbers n+5 or n+7 is dividsible by 4.

so this is what i came up with:

let n = 2k+1

f(n)= n+5
= (2k+1)+5
= 2k+6
= 2(k+3)

So we know that 2 is divisible by 2 and now I am guessing i have to prove that (k+3) is divisible by 2 as well. then by using the factor tree thing we can say that since the 2 is divisible by 2 and (k+3) is divisible by 2, f(n) must be divisible by 4, no? but i don't get how to do this... am i doing something wrong?

i did the same exact method with f(n)= n+7 and ended up with f(n)= 2(k+4).

i just don't get all this proving stuff.

Any help would be appreciated, thanks.

- Tu
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You're basically "home",because you have to prove that one of the 2 no. K+3 or K+4 is divisible with 2,thing which is trivial.

Daniel.
 
so how would i show that (k+3) or (k+4) is divisible by 2... that what i don't understand. it looks to me that not all cases will be divisible by 2 making the statement false, but my teacher says that none of them are false. unless I am doing this question totaly wrong... any ideas?

thnx.

- Tu
 
Can u show that from two consecutive natural numbers (as is the case with K+3 & K+4),one & only one is divisible by 2...??

Daniel.
 
yea tu it sucks balls (this is phillips)
 
oooo... omg i can't believe i didnt see that... so (k+3) and (k+4) are consecutive number, which mean one of them must be even, making one of them divisible by 2 correct?

- Tu
 
yes
also you didnt need to substitute if you think about it, you already had the consecutive pairs

n, n+5, and n+7
n being odd, you are adding 1 to make it even, than another 4
if that isn't divisible, the other pair adds another 2, so it must be divisible if the other wasnt.
 
Omg man thnx alot... i apreciate it man

- Tu

lol, hey wats up Philips, didnt know u go on here lol
 
  • #10
ooo i got yea philips... i should have seen that comming... man i hate this proof stuf... brutal...
 
  • #11
useful forum
hey daniel while you are here
how would you do

prove that n^5 - 5n^3 + 4n is always divisible by 120 when n is greater than or equal to 3

and prove that there are no integer solutions to the equation 2x + 4y = 5
since both 2 and 4 are even numbers, does that alone prove there are no solutions?
thanks!
 
Back
Top