How to Prove Global Existence for Two-Dimensional Cauchy Problems?

  • Thread starter Thread starter user40191
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cauchy
user40191
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Let y(t) = (y1(t), y2(t))^T and
A(t) = (a(t) b(t)
c(t) d(t)).

A(t) is a 2x2 matrix with a,b,c,d all polynomials in t. Consider the two dimensional Cauchy problem y'(t) = A(t)y(t), y(0)=y0.
Show that a solution exists for all t>=0.
Give a general condition on the A(t) which ensures global existence.

Please could you help me with this question - I don't know what to do. I need to use Picard somewhere I think but I don't know how to go about it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Okay, you know the name "Picard" so I presume you have seen the proof- probably for one dimension. Do exactly the same thing: dy/dt= Ay. Convert that to an integral equation by integrating both sides: y= A\int_0^x y(t) dt. Think of that as a "linear transformation", T(y)= A\int_0^x y(t)dt and, just as in the regular "Picard theorem", show that, under restrictions on the domain, that is a "contraction mapping".
 
HallsofIvy said:
Okay, you know the name "Picard" so I presume you have seen the proof- probably for one dimension. Do exactly the same thing: dy/dt= Ay. Convert that to an integral equation by integrating both sides: y= A\int_0^x y(t) dt. Think of that as a "linear transformation", T(y)= A\int_0^x y(t)dt and, just as in the regular "Picard theorem", show that, under restrictions on the domain, that is a "contraction mapping".

Can you take the matrix out of the integral even though its entries are polynomials in t?
 
You are right. I ignored the fact that entries are functions of t. It should be y= \int_0^x A(t)y(t)dt and T(y)= \int_0^x A(t)y(t)dt.
 
For a general initial condition \vec{y}(0)=\vec{y}_0 the integral equation reads
\vec{y}(t)=\vec{y}_0+\int_0^t \mathrm{d} t' \hat{A}(t') \vec{y}(t').
Now you can solve the problem easily by iteration. It's important to keep in mind that in general the matrices \hat{A}(t) do not commute at different times!
 
HallsofIvy said:
You are right. I ignored the fact that entries are functions of t. It should be y= \int_0^x A(t)y(t)dt and T(y)= \int_0^x A(t)y(t)dt.

Would you mind going into a little more depth about how you'd modify the Picard's theorem proof here? I'm a little confused as the version I've seen is really long.
 
Thread 'Direction Fields and Isoclines'
I sketched the isoclines for $$ m=-1,0,1,2 $$. Since both $$ \frac{dy}{dx} $$ and $$ D_{y} \frac{dy}{dx} $$ are continuous on the square region R defined by $$ -4\leq x \leq 4, -4 \leq y \leq 4 $$ the existence and uniqueness theorem guarantees that if we pick a point in the interior that lies on an isocline there will be a unique differentiable function (solution) passing through that point. I understand that a solution exists but I unsure how to actually sketch it. For example, consider a...
Back
Top