MHB How to prove this logarithmic inequality?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on proving the inequality that states (log_{24}(48))^2 + (log_{12}(54))^2 > 4. The original poster struggles with the problem, attempting to convert logarithms to base-10 and express the numbers in terms of 2 and 3, but finds it confusing. A participant suggests a simpler approach by breaking down the logarithms: log_{24}(48) can be expressed as 1 + log_{24}(2), and log_{12}(54) as 1 + log_{12}(4.5). This leads to the conclusion that the inequality holds true by demonstrating that the squared terms exceed 4. The discussion emphasizes the importance of simplifying logarithmic expressions to prove inequalities effectively.
anemone
Gold Member
MHB
POTW Director
Messages
3,851
Reaction score
115
Hi all, I've been having a hard time trying to solve the following inequality:

Prove that $\displaystyle \left(\log_{24}(48) \right)^2+\displaystyle \left(\log_{12}(54) \right)^2 >4$

I've tried to change the bases to base-10 log and relating all the figures (12, 24, 48, and 54) in terms of 2 and 3 but only to make the problem to be more confounded.

Could I get some hints on how to tackle this problem?

Any help would be deeply appreciated.

Thanks!

P.S. This question was originally asked here (http://www.mymathforum.com/viewtopic.php?f=13&t=27644&p=110515&hilit=noki#p110515) at MMF.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
anemone said:
Hi all, I've been having a hard time trying to solve the following inequality:

Prove that $\displaystyle \left(\log_{24}(48) \right)^2+\displaystyle \left(\log_{12}(54) \right)^2 >4$

I've tried to change the bases to base-10 log and relating all the figures (12, 24, 48, and 54) in terms of 2 and 3 but only to make the problem to be more confounded.

Could I get some hints on how to tackle this problem?

Any help would be deeply appreciated.

Thanks!

P.S. This question was originally asked here (http://www.mymathforum.com/viewtopic.php?f=13&t=27644&p=110515&hilit=noki#p110515) at MMF.

\(\log_{24}(48)=1+\log_{24}(2)\)

But \(2^5 \gt 24\) so \(\log_{24}(2) \gt 1/5\)

Also: \(\log_{12}(54)=1+\log_{12}(4.5)\), and \(4.5^5>12^3\) so \(\log_{12}(4.5)>3/5\)

Hence:
\[ (\log_{24}(48))^2 + (\log_{12}(54))^2 \gt 1.2^2+1.6^2 =4 \]

CB
 
Hi CB, a big thank for your help in making it so straightforward and simple for me!

Thanks.
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Back
Top