How to Prove Zero Product Property for Rational Numbers?

  • Thread starter Thread starter MathematicalMatt
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Proof
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving the Zero Product Property for rational numbers, which states that for any rational numbers a and b, the equation a*b=0 holds if and only if a=0 or b=0. The proof is established in two parts: first, demonstrating that if either a=0 or b=0, then a*b=0; second, showing that if a*b=0, then at least one of a or b must be zero. Key concepts include the multiplicative inverse of non-zero rationals and the properties of rational numbers.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of rational numbers and their properties
  • Familiarity with the concept of multiplicative inverses
  • Basic knowledge of mathematical proofs and logical reasoning
  • Ability to manipulate algebraic expressions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of rational numbers in-depth
  • Learn about mathematical proofs, specifically direct and indirect proofs
  • Explore the concept of multiplicative inverses in various number sets
  • Investigate related properties such as the Distributive Property and its implications
USEFUL FOR

Students of mathematics, educators teaching algebra, and anyone interested in foundational mathematical properties and proofs related to rational numbers.

MathematicalMatt
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Howdy, I just stumbled on this forum and was hoping someone could help with this proof:

If a and b are elements of the Rational Number set, then a*b=0, if and only if a=0 or b=0

With that in mind, I need to prove that:

  • Prove that if a=0 or b=0, then a*b=0
  • Prove that if a*b=0, then a=0 or b=0

Any help is appreciated, cheers.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
a) One can assume, without loss of generality, that a = 0. Then for any b, we have that ab = 0b = (0 + 0)b = 0b + 0b. Subtract 0b from both sides and you'll find that 0b - 0b = 0b, or equivalently 0b = 0.

b) Can we assume that every non-zero rational has an inverse? If both a and b are zero, then we are done. Suppose a is non-zero. Then b = 0*a^-1 = 0. The same argument can be repeated if b is non-zero.
 
Last edited:
One of the "axioms" or defining properties of the rational numbers is that every rational number, except 0, has a multiplicative inverse.

Given that ab= 0, either
1) a= 0 in which case we are done, or

2) a is not 0, in which case a-1(ab)= a-10 or b= 0.
 
Thanks for the help!
 
I am studying the mathematical formalism behind non-commutative geometry approach to quantum gravity. I was reading about Hopf algebras and their Drinfeld twist with a specific example of the Moyal-Weyl twist defined as F=exp(-iλ/2θ^(μν)∂_μ⊗∂_ν) where λ is a constant parametar and θ antisymmetric constant tensor. {∂_μ} is the basis of the tangent vector space over the underlying spacetime Now, from my understanding the enveloping algebra which appears in the definition of the Hopf algebra...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 55 ·
2
Replies
55
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
4K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
3K