How to Simplify a Summation with Unknown Last Term?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mohabitar
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Summation
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the confusion regarding how to simplify a summation with an unknown last term, specifically the term when k=n. Participants clarify that the summation should consist of the first n-3 terms plus the last term, which is k=n. It is emphasized that the summation should be broken into two parts: one for the terms from k=3 to k=n-1 and another for the last term, which should not be expressed as a summation. The importance of including all relevant terms in the summation is highlighted, correcting the misunderstanding that only the last two terms were represented. Overall, the key takeaway is to ensure that the summation accurately reflects all necessary components without overcomplicating the last term.
mohabitar
Messages
140
Reaction score
0
xnkMQ.png


I'm having a hard time understanding what this question is even asking for. Do I just write this summation in closed form? What does it mean by its last term, or the k=n term? I know I'm supposed to have at least attempted the problem, but I honestly have no idea what this question is even asking from me to begin with.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This is a finite sum with (n - 3) + 1 terms. All they're asking for is a summation consisting of the first n - 3 terms + the last term; i.e., the term when k = n.

To get the first summation, the index k should run from k = 3 to k = ?
 
to k=n-1? And the 2nd summation would just be for the actual value of n, correct? But there are two parts to this right? First break it up into its two parts, then write a summation that contains everything but its last term, so that would be everything from k=n-1.
 
Here's what I got so far:
Am I done? What else are they asking for?

4wWxZ.jpg
 
mohabitar said:
to k=n-1? And the 2nd summation would just be for the actual value of n, correct? But there are two parts to this right? First break it up into its two parts, then write a summation that contains everything but its last term, so that would be everything from k=n-1.
Everything from k = 3 to k = n - 1. There isn't really a second summation - you could write it as a summation, but it consists of just a single term, so writing it in summation form is overkill.
 
In your reply with the scan, you aren't getting it. The last term part should not be written as a summation. It is a single term.

The "remaining terms" part is wrong. Your summation represents only the last two terms of the original summation. It should include the first term, second term, ..., (n - 1)st term.
 
Since ##px^9+q## is the factor, then ##x^9=\frac{-q}{p}## will be one of the roots. Let ##f(x)=27x^{18}+bx^9+70##, then: $$27\left(\frac{-q}{p}\right)^2+b\left(\frac{-q}{p}\right)+70=0$$ $$b=27 \frac{q}{p}+70 \frac{p}{q}$$ $$b=\frac{27q^2+70p^2}{pq}$$ From this expression, it looks like there is no greatest value of ##b## because increasing the value of ##p## and ##q## will also increase the value of ##b##. How to find the greatest value of ##b##? Thanks
Back
Top